The Students’ Problem-Solving Abilities in Mathematics and English at the Secondary School Level
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.9.3.52##semicolon##
Problem-solving, ability, skill, communalities, secondary schoolپوختە
This paper investigates the perspectives of secondary school teachers of both mathematics and English on students’ abilities in problem solving in both subjects. Thus, the following objectives are intended to be achieved: identifying the students’ skills in problem-solving in both mathematics and English; and are there significant differences in both English and mathematics teachers’ perspectives on students’ problem-solving skills according to school, stage, and gender?
The quantitative, analytical, and descriptive methods used in the collection, classification, and processing of the study's data. The target population of the study was all secondary school math and English teachers in Erbil.
A sample of 72 teachers—26 male and 46 female—were selected from seven secondary schools using a random sampling technique for the academic year 2023–2024. Two questionnaires, one with 14 items for math teachers and another with 13 items for English teachers, were used to collect the data. Teachers' responses were scored on a scale of 1 for strongly disagree, 2 for disagree, 3 for neutral, 4 for agree, and 5 for strongly agree. The questionnaire's reliability, validity, and consistency were examined. and the validity and reliability of the questionnaire were checked. SPSS was used, mean, standard deviation, correlation, and ANOVA were used to analyze the data.
The study's findings confirmed similarities in problem-solving abilities that were shared between mathematics and English students, and there are no significant differences between the two areas due to the averages of students’ performance in problem-solving in both disciplines, which are fairly close to each other
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
سەرچاوەکان
Altun, M. (2015). Using role-play activities to develop speaking skills:A case study in the language classroom. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 1(4), 27-33.
Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S., & Nika, P. (2018). How does the degree of guidance support students’ metacognitive and problem solving skills in educational robotics?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 70-85.
Belinda Ho (2011). Solving the problems of designing and teaching a packed English for Specific Purposes course. New Horizons in Education, Vol.59, No.1, May 2011. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ955528.pdf [accessed Feb 20 2024].
Case, R., Williams, G., & Cobin, P. (2019). Problem-Solving Among English Language Learners: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach. International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 18-25. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijeedu.20190801.13
Chamberlin, S., Payne, A. M., & Kettler, T. (2020). Mathematical modeling: a positive learning approach to facilitate student sense making in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(4), 858-871.
Clancy, M. E., & Hruska, B. L. (2005). Developing language objectives for English language learners in physical education lessons. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 76(4), 30-35.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
DeBellis, V. and Goldin, G.: 1997, ‘The affective domain in mathematical problem solving’, in E. Pehkonen (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of PME, Vol. 2, Lahti, Finland: Univ. of Helsinki, pp. 209–216
Doghonadze,N.,& Gorgiladze,G.(2008). Problem solving in teaching foreign languages to students of pedagogical departments. IBSU Scientific Journal, 2(1),101-114.
D'Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031360
D’Zurilla, T. J., Nezu, A. M., & Maydeu-Olivares, T. (2002). Social Problem-Solving Inventory Revised (SPSI-R): Manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1076917
Evans, J. R. (1980). Solving word problems and elementary mathematical modelling. International Journal of Mathematical Educational in Science and Technology, 11(4), 517-522
Fatma Zehra Kök, and Burcu Duman (2023). The effect of problem-based learning on problem solving skills in English language teaching. Journal of Pedagogical Research Volume 7, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202318642 [accessed Feb 21 2024].
Fuchs,d, keupp, h. ,trask, P., & Tanabe, K. (2012). Taxonomy, morphology and phylogeny of Late Cretaceous spirulid coleoids (Cephalopoda) from Greenland and Canada. Palaeontology, 55(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-4983.2011.01125.X
Gökkurt, B., & Soylu, Y. (2013). Levels of students’ use of semantic knowledge in problem solving process. Kastamonu Education Journal, 21(2), 469–488.
Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 137-165.
Goldin, G. A. (1988). Affective representation and mathematical problem solving. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter of International Group Vol. 2, pp. 1-7.
Gough, J. (2007). Conceptual complexity and apparent contradictions in mathematics language. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63(2), 8–16.
Gökkurt, B., & Soylu, Y. (2013). Levels of students’ use of semantic knowledge in problem solving process. Kastamonu Education Journal, 21(2), 469–488.
Hansen, E. K. S. (2022). Students’ agency, creative reasoning, and collaboration in mathematical problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 813-834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00365-y
Hao, J., Liu, L., von Davier, A., Kyllonen, P., and Kitchen, C. (2016). “Collaborative problem-solving skills vs. collaboration outcomes: findings from statistical analysis and data mining,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (Raleigh, NC), 382–387.
Hayes, J.R. (1989). The Complete Problem Solver (2nd ed.). Rutledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062715
Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of counseling psychology, 29(1), 66.
Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R. (2008). Problem-based learning. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 485-506). Routledge.
Lei, Q., Mason, R. A., Xin, Y. P., Davis, J. L., David, M., & Lory, C. (2020). A meta‐analysis of single‐case research on mathematics word problem‐solving interventions for English learners with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(4), 201-217.
İncebacak, B. B., & Ersoy, E. (2016). Problem solving skills of secondary school students. China-USA Business Review, 15(6), 275-285.
Jader, J., Lithner, J., & Sidenvall, J. (2020). Mathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countries. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1120-1136.
Leith, C., Rose, E., & King, T. (2016). Teaching Mathematics and Language to English Learners. The Mathematics Teacher, 109(9), 670-678. Retrieved Mar 19, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.109.9.0670
Liljedahl, P., & Cai, J. (2021). Empirical research on problem solving and problem posing: a look at the state of the art. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(4), 723-735.
Lucero, A. (2012). Demands and opportunities: Analyzing academic language in a first-grade dual language program. Linguistics and Education, 23, 277–288. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257313767_Demands_and_opportunities_Analyzing_academic_language_in_a_first_grade_dual_language_program
Mayer, R.E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory Into Practice, 41, 226 - 232. DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
Mezel, J. A., Khaleel, A. F., & Taher, N. A. H. (2021). The Need of University Faculty Member for Training on Mathematics Teaching Skills in Kurdistan Region of Iraq Universities According to University Educational Quality Standards. Journal of Basra researches for Human Sciences, 46(4-A).
[MoNE] Ministry of National Education (2009). Primary schools’ mathematics curriculum (6, 7, and 8th grades). Ankara: MoNE Board of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED589096.pdf
[MoNE] Ministry of National Education (2013a). Middle school mathematics curriculum (5, 6, 7, and 8th grades). Ankara: MoNE Board of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED589096.pdf
[MoNE] Ministry of National Education (2013b). Secondary school mathematics curriculum (9, 10, 11, and 12th grades). Ankara: MoNE Board of Education.
NCTM Standards (1989) National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Commission on Standards for School Mathematics. http://standards.nctm.org.
(NCTM) (2000). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Principles and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved June 28, 2005, from http://standards.nctm.org, p. 12.
Nickerson, R.S. (1999) ‘Enhancing creativity’, in R.J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.392–430.
Olkun, S., & Toluk, Z. (2004). Teacher questioning with an appropriate manipulative may make a big difference. DOI:10.1501/0003629
Polya, G. (1988). How to solve it, a new aspect of mathematical method (2nd Ed.). Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=2131905
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 23(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461
Soylu, Y., & Soylu, C. (2006). Matematik derslerinde başariya giden yolda problem çözmenin rolü. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Incebacak, Belgin &Ersoy, Esen 2016 .7(11), 97-111.
Sriraman, B., & English, L. D. (Eds.). (2010). Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 309-331). New York: Springer.
Taher, N. A. H. (2019). Skills Required for Mathematics Faculty Members to conduct Research in Math Education. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(13), p579.
Taher, H., & Abdul, N. (2019). Impact of virtual learning enviroments on students mathematical performance. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(13), 528-536.
Taher, N. A. H., Nagaraju, G., & Eslavath, K. D. N. (2019). Motivating students in learning mathematics by using contextual teaching strategies. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28, 13.
Wertheimer, M. (1985). A gestalt perspective on computer simulations of cognitive processes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 1, in Maria Bagassi and Laura Macchi (2020). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.538202/full. [accessed Feb 21 2024].
Wiest, L. R. (2008). Problem-Solving Support for English Language Learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(8), 479-484. Retrieved Mar 18, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.14.8.0479
W. James Jacob, Stephanie Lehner (2011). Secondary Education: A Guide to Education Project Design. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332423834_Secondary_Education_A_Guide_to_Education_Project_Design#fullTextFileContent [accessed Feb25 2024].
Yildiz, C. (2016). Investigation of Mathematics Teachers' Views about Improving Problem Solving Skills. Online Submission, 4, 471-481.
##submission.downloads##
بڵاو کرایەوە
چۆنییەتی بەکارهێنانی سەرچاوە
ژمارە
بەش
##submission.license##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##Qalaai Zanist Journal allows the author to retain the copyright in their articles. Articles are instead made available under a Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use research provided the author is correctly attributed.
Creative Commons is a licensing scheme that allows authors to license their work so that others may re-use it without having to contact them for permission
