The duration of the peer review process in Qalaai Zanist Scientific Journal depends on multiple factors, including the complexity of the submitted work, the number of reviewers involved, and the journal's specific policies. On average, the manuscript review process takes approximately 11 to 20 weeks. Below is an outline of the standard steps and estimated timeline for the peer review process:
Submission: Authors submit their manuscript or research work to the journal.
Initial Assessment (1-2 weeks) : The editorial team conducts a preliminary review to ensure the submission meets basic requirements, including adherence to journal guidelines and ethical standards.
Reviewer Assignment (2-4 weeks): Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in the subject matter, with consideration given to potential conflicts of interest.
Peer Review (2-4 weeks; may vary based on the nature of revisions): Assigned reviewers evaluate the manuscript for quality, methodology, originality, and other essential criteria. This stage may include multiple review rounds and revisions.
Editorial Decision (1-2 weeks): The editorial board makes a decision based on the reviewers' feedback. Possible outcomes include acceptance, minor or major revision, resubmission, or rejection.
Revision (if required, 2-4 weeks- depending on revision complexity): If revisions are requested, authors modify their manuscript according to reviewers' comments and submit the revised version.
Final Decision (1-2 weeks): The revised manuscript undergoes a final evaluation to ensure all requested changes are adequately addressed. The editorial team then makes a final decision and informs the author.
Publication (if accepted, 2 weeks-subject to scheduling and production processes): The accepted manuscript is prepared for publication, including final formatting, proofreading, and online or print dissemination.
These timeframes serve as general estimates, and the actual duration may vary based on factors such as the responsiveness of authors and reviewers, the complexity of the manuscript, and the journal's workload. The journal is committed to maintaining a rigorous and efficient review process while upholding high academic and ethical standards.