Reference Point Phenomena in English and Kurdish: A comparative Study

Haybat Shaker Qadir; Ali Mahmood Jukil

doi:10.25212/lfu.qzj.9.2.40

توێژەران

Haybat Shaker Qadir Department of English, College of Basic Education, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Ali Mahmood Jukil Department of English, College of Basic Education, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.9.2.40

##semicolon##

Reference Point, Metonymy, Figure/ Ground, Possessive, Definite Article

پوختە

An analysis of reference point phenomena in Kurdish and English is presented in this article. In order to find out differences and similarities between Kurdish and English, the study compares both languages' reference points. A variety of grammatical phenomena, including prototype, figure/ ground, definite article, metonymy, pronominal anaphora, possessive constructions, topic and topic-like constructions, are explored and described according to Langacker’s reference-point model. All of these structures have the feature that one salient thing acts as a cognitive reference point, allowing the mind access to a less salient, connected entity. The definite article in Kurdish is expressed by an added clitic. It seems that in Kurdish, ezafe and possessive pronoun clitics serve as relational identifiers between the target and reference point.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

سەرچاوەکان

de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. R. (2021). Conceptual Metonymy Theory revisited: Some definitional and taxonomic issues 1. In The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 204-227). Routledge.

Dirven, R., & Radden, G. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. Cognitive English Grammar, 1-388. John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

Fatah, A. H., & Aghal, A. E. (2022). Possessive Constructions in Central Kurdish: A Cognitive Grammar Account. Journal of University of Human Development, 8(3), 156-166.

Langacker, R. (2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Langacker, R. (2017). Ten lectures on the basics of cognitive grammar. Brill.

Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions.

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 2). MIT press.

Tribushinina, E. (2008). Cognitive reference points: Semantics beyond the prototypes in adjectives of space and colour. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.

Unpublished Dissertation, Abdulla, I. A. (2019). A Cognitive Semantic Study of Metaphysical Poetry.