A Cognitive Grammatical Analysis of Inalienable Possessives in Orwell’s “Animal Farm”

Authors

  • Alaa Nawzad Awla Hammad Department of English, College of Languages, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Iraq
  • Abbas Fadhil Lutfi Department of English, College of Languages, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.4.2.25

Keywords:

Experiential Linguistics, Cognitive Grammar, Possessives, Orwell, Templates, Possession Gestalt

Abstract

The present paper focuses on investigating inalienable possessive constructions as a part of human experience of the world within the framework of cognitive grammar using Heine’s (1997a, 1997b) model. The traditional approaches to language deal with the structure and meaning of possessive constructions as to be determined by a formal rule system and neglect their conventionalized cognitive structure. In English, a possessive construction conceptualizes a range of different semantic relations in a way that referring to all these meanings as “possessive” would be misleading. The paper aims at explaining an assumption that inalienable possessive expressions are combined in chain-like conceptual integration. The paper also focuses on explaining that the grammatical structure of inalienable possessives is predictable once people know the range of conventionalized cognitive structures from which they are derived. Another aim is to show that possession does have a privileged status in the semantics of other different concepts. One of the hypotheses is that the way the two component entities in different inalienable PCs are combined, depends on the conceptual structure of both entities (PR-PM). Another hypothesis is that there are certain highly abstract and complex concepts in the mind of speaker that grammar cannot conceptualize. Such complex concepts are generally structuralized by the structures of some other concrete concepts, which are the event schemas. The paper concludes that the grammatical structures of the randomly occurring possessives are built via the conceptual correspondence between the possessor and possessum with the ability to project concrete concepts onto other less concrete concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, I, A. 2019. A Cognitive Semantic Study of Metaphysical Poetry. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Salahaddin University. Erbil, Kurdistan Region.

Albayati, A. F. 2014. Possessive Constructions in Some Arabic Dialects with Reference to English: A Cognitive Grammatical Study. International Journal of Arts,1. pp.83-94.

Barcelona, A., & Valenzuela. J. 2011. An Overview of Cognitive Linguistics. In M. Brdar,S.T. Gries, & M.Z. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion,(pp.17-44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Bentley, D, Ciconte, F. M. & Cruschina, S. 2013. Existential Constructions in Cross linguistic Perspective. Rivista di Linguistica, 25, (1). pp.1-13.

Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. London. Allen & Unwin.

Evans, V., & Green, M. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Evans, V. 2007. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Evans, V., Bergen, B., & Zinken, J. 2007. The Cognitive Linguistics Enterprise: An Overview. In V. Evans, B. Bergen, & J. Zinken. (Eds.). The cognitive linguistics reader, (pp. 236). London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Geeraerts, D. 2006. A Rough Guide to Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts, (Ed.). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Berlin/ New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. pp.1-28.

Greeno, J. G., & Moore, J. L. 1993. Situativity and Symbols: Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17. pp.49-59.

Heine, B. 1997a. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heine, B. 1997b. Possession: Cognitive Forces, Sources, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Janda, L. A. 2010. Cognitive Linguistics in the Year 2010. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1). PP.1-30.

Lakoff, G. 1977. Linguistic Gestalts. Chicago Linguistic Society, 13. pp.236-287.

Langacker, R.W. 1978. The Form and Meaning of the English Auxiliary. Language, 54 (4). pp.853-882.

Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. (Vol.1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W.1988. The Nature of Grammatical Valence. In B. Rudzka Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, (91-125). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Descriptive Application. (Vol.2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R.W. 1995. Possession and Possessive Constructions. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLauray (eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, (pp.51–79). Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.

Langacker, R. W. 1998. Conceptualization, Symbolization and Grammar. In M. Tomasello. (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language, (pp.1-39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Langacker, R. W. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lee, D. 2001. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Malmkjar, K. (ed.) 2010. The Routledge Linguistic Encyclopedic. (3rd Ed.). London: Routledge.

Nikiforidou, K. 1991. The Meanings of the Genitive: A Case Study in Semantic Structure and Semantic Change. Cognitive Linguistics, 2. pp.149-205.

Orwell, G. 1945/2013. Animal Farm. London/New York, NY: Alfred A.Knopf, a Division of Random House, Inc.

Radden, G., & Driven, R. 2007. Cognitive English Grammar. (Vol.2).Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Radden, G. 2008. The Cognitive Approach to Language. In J. Andor, B. Hollósy, T. Laczkó, & P. Pelyvás, (Eds.), When grammar minds language and literature, (pp.387-412). Debrecen: Institute of English and American Studies.

Rentsch, J. R., Mot, I. & Abbe, A. 2009. Identifying the Core Content and Structure of a Schema for Cultural Understanding. Arlington, VA: United States Army Research Institute.

Saeed, J, I.2013. Semantics. (3rd Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Sinha, C. 2007. Cognitive Linguistics, Psychology, and Cognitive Science. In: D. Geeraerts and H.Cuyckens. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, (pp. 1267-1294). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, J, R. 1989. Possessive genitives in English. Linguistics, 27. pp. 663-686.

Taylor, J, R. 1996. Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, J, R. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Alaa Nawzad Awla Hammad, & Abbas Fadhil Lutfi. (2019). A Cognitive Grammatical Analysis of Inalienable Possessives in Orwell’s “Animal Farm”. QALAAI ZANIST JOURNAL, 4(2), 771–808. https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.4.2.25

Issue

Section

Articles