How Film Affects English Language Learning Instruction

Shivan khudhur Dizayee

doi:10.25212/lfu.qzj.3.1.45

توێژەران

Shivan khudhur Dizayee Lebanese French Univeristy

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.3.1.45

##semicolon##

Learning and Teaching, skill, speaking, communication, unfamiliar background, student

پوختە

The teaching and learning of English as a second language or a foreign linguistic communication is practised in many non-English speaking countries globally. Special English teaching centres have been built in these states to facilitate English language
reading and instruction. The centres focus mainly on the teaching and learning of the English language through the skills of reading and writing. Novel methods of teaching English using the latest technology has been embraced by many learning centres and using film adaptations are one among them. Films being excellent sources of literature and language, teaching English language can be made more interesting and efficient by the use of films which provide the students with ample opportunities and
facilities for learning. The main lacunae in the learning procedure, nevertheless, is the immense array of words in English, the unfamiliar background of the students, difficulty in comprehending the words and phrases, the communication gap between teachers and pupils, and the numerous choices in the movie versions. The main objective of the current study is to investigate the perspectives of the students on the effect of using film adaptations in learninglaguage, to assess the efficacy of the film adaptations as tools in teaching literature with respect to the students. The survey was taken utilizing a questionnaire directed to
measure the posture of the students in using the motion picture adaptations. The results evaluated in the study were of two types, e.g., results directly abstracted from the questionnaire and results that are evaluated based on the statistical formula applied over it to retain the actual trends in the feedback collected from the respondents in the field survey. It is evident
from the current study that the students are greatly benefitted by viewing the film adaptations since films provided effective teaching and learning methods and enhanced the individual skills of speaking, listening, reading and writing. However, the small sample size, and the study being confined to a small population, generalizations are not possible.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

سەرچاوەکان

Abu Baker, K., Sulaiman, N.F. and Rafaai, Z.A.M. (2010). Self-determination theory and motivational orientations of Arabic learners: a principal component analysis. GEMA Online TM Journal of Language Studies, 10(1), 71-86.

Al-Khairy, M., (2013). English as a foreign language learning DE motivational factors as perceived by Saudi undergraduates. European Scientific Journal, 9(32).

AL-NOFAIE. H. (2010). The attitudes of teachers and students towards using Arabic in EFL classrooms in Saudi public schools- a case study. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 4 (1), 64-95.

Alqurashi, F., (2011). Teaching English for Police Purposes in Saudi Arabia: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2(4), 844-849.

Alsamadani, H. A. (2008). The relationship between Saudi EFL college-level students’ use of reading strategies and their EFL reading comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University).

Al-Seghayer, K. (2005). Teaching English in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: slowly by steadily changing. In Braine, G. (Ed.). Teaching English to the world: History, curriculum and practice. New Jersey: Routledge.

Al-Seghayer, K. (2005). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Research in Technology and Second Language Education: Developments and Directions, 1, 202-232.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Biswas, A.R., (2005). Critique of poetics, 538, Atlantic Publishers and Distributors: New Delhi.

Brown, H.D. (2006). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Canning, J. (2004). "Disability and residence abroad." Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies Good Practice Guide. Retrieved 7 October 2008, from http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/2241

Canning-Wilson, C., and Wallace, J. (2000). Practical aspects of using video in the foreign language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6, 36-31.

Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 273-284.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow, England: Longman.

Douglas, B.H. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco University: Pearson Longman.

Eagleton, T. (2003). Literary theory: an introduction, 16. Blackwell Publishers Ltd:Great Britain.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. and Hyams, N. (2007). An Introduction to Language. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.

Gregory, RL. (1972). Eyeand brain. NewYork: McGraw-Hill

Haddad, J. (2012). The Parrot's two feet: Teaching French in contact with Arabic. Available, .

Harris, Arna S. and Allan C. Harris. (1967a). A selected annotated bibliography of American literature for TESOL: Part I—the novel. TESOL Quarterly, 1(3), 56-62.

Hegel, G.W.F., (2009). Hegel's aesthetics. Available at, .

Javid, C.Z., Farooq, U. and Gulzar, M.A. (2012). Saudi English-major undergraduates and English Teachers' perceptions regarding effective ELT in the KSA: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Scientific Research, 85(1), 55-70. ISBN: 1450-216X/1450-202X.

Khan, I. (2011). Learning difficulties in English: Diagnosis and pedagogy in Saudi Arabia. Educational Research, 2 (7), 1248-1257.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Krashen, S. and Terrell, T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Learning acquisition in the classroom.

Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across Cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Michigan: University of Michigan.

Lado, Robert, (1964). Language teaching: A scientific approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Long, M.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.

Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, 413-468. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Lucas, R.I., Pulido, D., Miraflores, E., Ignacio, A., Tacay, M., and Lao, J. (2010). A Study on the intrinsic motivation factors in second language learning among selected freshman students. Philippine ESL Journal, 4, 3-23.

Middleman, R.R. and Goldberg, G. (1972). The concept of structure in experiential learning. The Pfeiffer Library, 17, 2nd (Ed.).

Mochida, A. (2002). What was the theoretical and empirical justification for the rise of communicative language teaching? Available at, <

http://www.geocities.jp/akiramochida33/clt.html>.

Ohmann, R. (1971). Speech acts and the definition of literature. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1-19.

Progosh, D. (1996). Using Video for Listening Assessment: Opinions of Test-Takers. Tesl Canada Journaula Revue Tesl Du Canada, 14(1).

Rivkin. J., Michael. M. (Eds.). (2004). Literary theory: An anthology. 2nd edition. Blackwell publishing Ltd.: USA.

Roknee and Ataee, 2014. Movies in EFL classrooms: with or without subtitles Dr the Dawn Journal Vol. 3, NO. 1.715-726

Simon Ryan and Delyse Ryan. What is literature? Foundation: fundamentals of literature and drama. Australian Catholic University. Accessed on 9 February (2014).

Steen, G. (1999). Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 109-120.

Van, T.T.M. (2009). The relevance of literary analysis to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum 3:2-9.