Mobile Application as Platform for Publicly Oriented Government Communications in The Public Services of The Kurdistan Regional Government:
Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.8.2.47Keywords:
Smart governance, government communication, smart city, m-government, mobile applications.Abstract
The idea of a "smart city" is thought to apply to overcoming many of the challenges that urban areas in the twenty-first century face. The use of technology in the form of 'mobile government' ('m-government') is thought to connect public needs with government services. Using a mobile application (mobile app) as a medium of government communication is one form of ‘m-government'. This study is based on Mobile apps as a government communication case study, it is conducted by using a web survey (google form) that included many closed type questions as well as a few open type questions directed to the citizens in the Kurdistan region. To analyze the data, we used the (full form of SPSS) version 22 program and the qualitative methods used to assess the validity of this study are interviews and observations. Furthermore, despite the fact that 97.76% of them favor the idea of an e-government, 2.24% of the respondents were against e-government'. The use of mobile apps not only to operate the government's contact function, which serves as a tool for government socialization, but also to serve as a platform for providing public needs in the private and public sectors. The study's most important finding is that mobile applications can be used for public-oriented government communication in Kurdistan Region. Using mobile applications in the sense of good governance will be helped to implement the ideals of inclusion, equality, and transparency
Downloads
References
Citing a Journal Article:
Abdullah, N. N., 2021. Factors Affecting the Adoption of e-Government in Public Sector Organizations of Kurdistan Region. Public administration aspects, 9(2), pp. 15-27.
Abu Bakar, N. S., & Abdul Rahman, A., 2016. Personalization strategies implementation for Malaysian m-government services. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(34), 1-6.
Azeez, N. D., & Lakulu, M. M., 2018. Evaluation framework of m-government services success in Malaysia. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(24), 8194-8226.
Bearfield, D. A., & Bowman, A. O. M. (2017). Can you find it on the web? An assessment of municipal e-government transparency. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 172-188.
Belanger, F., Carter, K.D. & Schaupp, L.C. U-government: A framework for the evolution of e-government. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 2(4), pp. 426–445, 2005.
Christensen, T., & Lodge, M. (2018). Reputation management in societal security: A comparative study. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 119-132.
Cumbie, B. A., & Kar, B. (2016). A study of local government website inclusiveness: The gap between e-government concept and practice. Information Technology for Development, 22(1), 15-35.
Daubs, M. S., & Manzerolle, V. R. (2016). App-centric mobile media and commoditization: Implications for the future of the open Web. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 52-68.
de Mello Miranda, P. R., da Cunha, M. A. V. C., & Pugas Filho, J. M. (2016). eParticipation in smart cities of developing countries: Research-based practical recommendations. In Smarter as the New Urban Agenda (pp. 315-332). Springer, Cham.
Dutra, D., & Soares, D. (2019, April). Mobile applications in central government of Brazil and Portugal. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 86-92).
Eom, S. J., Hwang, H., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Can social media increase government responsiveness? A case study of Seoul, Korea. Government information quarterly, 35(1), 109-122.
Fakhoury, R., & Aubert, B. (2015). Citizenship, trust, and behavioural intentions to use public e-services: The case of Lebanon. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 346-351.
Firdaus, M. S. A., & Djaja, K. (2017). Mobile Apps As Government Communication Media In Urban Public Services: Case Study–The Usage Of Qlue Application By Jakarta Provincial Government. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 210, 417-430.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513-522.
Ganapati, S. (2015). Using mobile apps in government. Washington DC: IBM Center for The Business of Government.
Gerlitz, C., Helmond, A., Vlist, F.N. van der and Weltevrede, E. 2019. Regram-ming the Platform: Infrastructural Relations between Apps and Social Media. Computational Culture. 7 (2019), 1–42.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (Eds.). (2015). Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (Vol. 11). Springer.
Goldsmith, S. and Crawford, S. The Responsive City: Engaging Communities Through Data-Smart Governance. Josey Bass: San Francisco, 2014.
Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020). Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101487.
Ho, A. (2017, January). Big data and evidence-driven decision-making: Analyzing the practices of large and mid-sized US cities. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Ho, A. T. K., & McCall, B. (2016). Ten actions to implement big data initiatives: A study of 65 cities.
James, O., and C. Petersen. 2017. “International Rankings of Government Performance and Source Credibility for Citizens: Experiments about E-Government Rankings in the UK and the Netherlands.” Public Management Review 1–16.
Jia, Z., Liu, M., & Shao, G. (2019). Linking government social media usage to public perceptions of government performance: an empirical study from China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(1), 84-101.
Kurfalı, M., Arifoğlu, A., Tokdemir, G., & Paçin, Y. (2017). Adoption of e-government services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 168-178.
Lanza, B. B. B. (2016, March). Business Model for SMS-Based Government Services: an Analysis from Configuration Theory. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 420-423).
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New media & society, 20(3), 881-900.
Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2018). Does e-government performance actually boost citizen use? Evidence from European countries. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1513-1532.
Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2019). National e-government performance and citizen satisfaction: a multilevel analysis across European countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 506-526.
Mainka, A., Hartmann, S., Meschede, C., & Stock, W. G. (2015). Mobile application services based upon open urban government data. iConference 2015 Proceedings.
Matos, E., BB Lanza, B., & D. Lara, R. (2021, June). Mobile Government in States: Exploratory research on the development of mobile apps by the Brazilian subnational government. In DG. O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 351-362).
McLuhan, M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of man. McGraw Hill Book Company: New York, 1964,2016.
Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198-206.
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. international review of administrative sciences, 82(2), 392-408.
Mergel, I. (2015). Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. social science computer review, 33(5), 599-612.
Mergel, I. (2018). Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge. gov. Public Management Review, 20(5), 726-745.
Meyerhoff Nielsen, M., & Jordanoski, Z. (2020, June). Digital transformation, governance and coordination models: A comparative study of Australia, Denmark and the Republic of Korea. In The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 285-293).
Michelucci, F. V., De Marco, A., & Tanda, A. (2016). Defining the role of the Smart-City manager: An analysis of responsibilities and skills. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(3), 23-42.
Morris, J. W., & Murray, S. (2018). Appified: Culture in the age of apps. University of Michigan Press.
Munyoka, W., & Maharaj, M. S., 2019. Privacy, security, trust, risk and optimism bias in e-government use: The case of two Southern African Development Community countries. SA Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 1-9.
Nielsen, M. M. (2017). Governance failure in light of Government 3.0: Foundations for building next generation eGovernment maturity models. In Government 3.0–Next Generation Government Technology Infrastructure and Services (pp. 63-109). Springer, Cham.
Plantin, J. C., & Punathambekar, A. (2019). Digital media infrastructures: pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, culture & society, 41(2), 163-174.
Porumbescu, G. A. (2016). Comparing the effects of e-government and social media use on trust in government: evidence from Seoul, South Korea. Public Management Review, 18(9), 1308-1334.
Porumbescu, G. A. (2016). Linking public sector social media and e-government website use to trust in government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 291-304.
Rabaiah, A. (2019). State of Play of Mobile Government Apps on Google Play Store. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 13(5), 240-249.
Reddick, C.G., & Zheng, Y., 2017. Determinants of citizens’ mobile apps future use in Chinese local governments: An analysis of survey data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(2), 213- 235.
Rooks, G., Matzat, U., & Sadowski, B. (2017). An empirical test of stage models of e-government development: Evidence from Dutch municipalities. The Information Society, 33(4), 215-225.
Saxena, S. (2018). Role of “perceived risks” in adopting mobile government (m-government) services in India. foresight.
Sharma, S. K., Al-Badi, A., Rana, N. P., & Al-Azizi, L. (2018). Mobile applications in government services (mG-App) from user's perspectives: A predictive modelling approach. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 557-568.
Song, C., & Lee, J. (2016). Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 430-453.
Tang, A.K.Y. 2016. Mobile App Monetization: App Business Models in the Digital Era. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. (2016), 224–227.
Tang, T., & Ho, A. T. K. (2019). A path-dependence perspective on the adoption of Internet of Things: Evidence from early adopters of smart and connected sensors in the United States. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 321-332.
Tang, T., Hou, J., Fay, D. L., & Annis, C. (2021). Revisit the drivers and barriers to e-governance in the mobile age: A case study on the adoption of city management mobile apps for smart urban governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 43(4), 563-585.
Tola, A. (2020). Effect of E-Government Based Service Delivery on Customers’ Satisfaction: The Case of Addis Ababa City Administration Vital Events Registration Agency. GRIN Verlag.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., Chan, F. K., & Hu, P. J. (2016). Managing citizens’ uncertainty in e-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Information systems research, 27(1), 87-111.
Wagner, S. A., Vogt, S., & Kabst, R. (2016). How IT and social change facilitates public participation: a stakeholder-oriented approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 435-443.
Wang, G., Chen, Q., Xu, Z., & Leng, X. (2020). Can the use of government Apps shape citizen compliance? The mediating role of different perceptions of government. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106335.
Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017). Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk. The Electronic Library.
Yap, C. S., Ahmad, R., Newaz, F. T., & Mason, C. (2019). Enhancing the Use of Government Mobile Applications: The Perspective of Citizen-initiated Contacts Theory. In KMIS (pp. 258-263).
Citing Online Lecture Notes or Presentation Slides:
Digital-in-Iraq (2021). https://datareportal.com/digital-in-iraq
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Qalaai Zanist Journal allows the author to retain the copyright in their articles. Articles are instead made available under a Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use research provided the author is correctly attributed.
Creative Commons is a licensing scheme that allows authors to license their work so that others may re-use it without having to contact them for permission