The Effect of Governance Indicators on Economic Growth (Case Study) The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

Authors

  • الودرسة الوساغدة وفاء صتاح خدر ٞ٢ٰث االدراة واالٛخهاد / سا٤ٓث د٪٬ك

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.2.5.29

Keywords:

Economic growth, Financial crises, Governance, Corruption control, Legal sovereignty

Abstract

The global financial crises and collapses that affected the institutions, which were caused by a lack of competencies and expertise in the management of institutions, in the sense not to take the principle of governance, which led to the collapse of these institutions As a result of these collapses, many international institutions and institutions in the governance . Therefore, the importance of research was that governance plays an important role in creating an economic climate conducive to achieving economic stability and raising economic growth rates. The lack of good building for national institutions and effective laws contributes to the provision of adequate environment for the corrupt, but has neglected many important indicators in reaching the desired goal of these countries. The objective of the research is to identify governance and indicators, Control of corruption, government effectiveness, political stability, legal sovereignty, quality of legislation, opinion and accountability), their impact on economic growth in Jordan, study of economic growth indicators and knowledge of the relationship between governance indicators and economic growth of Jordan . The research hypothesized that governance has a significant impact on economic growth. The research was based on theoretical analytical method, analytical quantitative approach and statistical program for social sciences. The results of the standard estimation were used using the method of the normal minimum squares based on data obtained by the World Bank. The study found that the effectiveness of governance, political stability, opinion and issue had a
significant effect on economic growth. Indicators (control of corruption, legal sovereignty, and quality of legislation) were insignificant in economic growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

أ - ا٬١ذائٚ ا١ؽـ٥ٰث:-

- ا١خٜؽٯؽ االٛخهادي ا٥١غهم، " أ٘اق األٛخهاد األرد٧ٮ 2015،ا٢٥٥١ٟث األرد٧ٰث ا٫١اك٥ٰث .www.k as .de ،

- حٜؽٯؽ ا١خ٥٨ٰث ٘ٮ ا١لؽق األوـً وا٘ؽٯٰٜا، "إدارة ضٟ٣ أ٘ي٠ ألس٠ ا١خ٥٨ٰث ٘ٮ ا١لؽق األوـً وأ٘ؽٯٰٜا"، ا١ت٨ ٝا١ػو١ٮ، دار ا١فاٛٮ ٨٢١لؽ ، ةٰؽوت ، ١ت٨ان، 2004.

٪ - ئٰث ـ٬ق رأس ا٥١ال ا١ٙف٢ٍ٨ٰث ، " ا٥١ال٤ص ا١ؽئٰفٰث ١ط٬ٞ٥ث ا١لؽٞات ا٥١فا٪٥ث ا١ٓا٤ث ا٥١ػرسث ٘ٮ ة٬رنث ٘٢فٍٰ٦ ،" اإلدارة ا١ٓا٤ث ٢١ػراـات وا١خٍ٬ٯؽ ، ٘٢فٍٰ٦،2012. ،

٪ - ئٰث ٤ٟا٘صة ا١ٙفاد،ا١خٜؽٯؽ ا١ف٬٨ي 2014 ،ا٢٥٥١ٟث االرد٧ٰث ا٫١اك٥ٰث.

- وزارة ا١خغًٍٰ وا١خٓاون ا١ػو١ٮ،عٍث ا١خ٥٨ٰث االٛخهادٯث واالسخ٥اْٰث 2004- 2006،ا٢٥٥١ٟث األرد٧ٰث ا٫١اك٥ٰث،.

-ضػاد، ٨٤اور، " دور ض٬ٞ٥ث ا١لؽٞات ٘ٮ ا١خ٥٨ٰث االٛخهادٯث " ٤ؤح٥ؽ ا١ٓ٢٥ٮ االول ،سا٤ٓث د٤لٚ ، ـ٬رٯا، ٢١ٙخؽة 15-16 حلؽٯ٦ االول 2008

ْ-تػي، ٤ؽٯ٣ ة٦ ، وض٥ادة ،٤ؽوة ، "دور ا١ط٬ٞ٥ث ٘ٮ حطفٰ٦ اداء ا٥١ؤـفات ا١ٓا٤ث دراـث ضا١ث سا٤ٓث 8 ٤اي 1945ٛ ائ٥ث"، رـا١ث ٤اسفخٰؽ ٨٤ل٬رة ،ٞ٢ٰث ا١طٜ٬ق وا١ٓ٬٢م ا١فٰاـٰث ، ا١شؾائؽ ، 2014

- ا١تفام، ةفام ا١ٓتػا٢١ث " ا١ط٬ٞ٥ث ا١ؽكٰػة دراـث ضا١ث ا١ٓؽةٰث ا١فٓ٬دٯث "، االٞادٯ٥ٰث ٢١ػراـات االسخ٥اْٰث واال٧فا٧ٰث، ا١ٓػد 67-68 ،سا٤ٓث ضفٰتث ة٦ ة٬ْ٢ٮ اة٬ ك٢ ، ٗ

.200-176 ص،2014 ، شؾائؽ١ا

- ا١ل٥ؽي ، ٤اٯص كتٰب، وْ٬ٯق،ضفٰ٦ْ ٢ٮ، " ا١ٓالٛث ةٰ٦ ا١ط٬ٞ٥ث وا٬٥٨١ االٛخهادي ٘ٮ ا١ش٬٫٥رٯث االـال٤ٰث االٯؽا٧ٰث "٤ش٢ث ا١ٟ٬ت ٢١ٓ٬٢م االٛخهادٯث واألدارٯث ،سا٤ٓث واـً، .20-1ص، 2016، ؽاقٓ١ا، 22ػدٓ١ا

- ا٥١ٍ٬ري ، اض٥ػ ساـف٣" ،٤ػى ح٬ا٘ؽ ٤ؤكؽات إدارة ا١طٟ٣ واذار٪ا ْ٢٭ ا٬٥٨١ االٛخهادي "، ٤ش٢ث االٛخهاد ا١غ٢ٰشٮ، ا١ٓػد 19 ،سا٤ٓث ا١ٟ٬٘ث، ا١ٓؽاق ، 2011، ص1-22.

ْ - ان٣ ع٬٢د، وا١ٓتٰػي، و٧اس ، "دور ض٬ٞ٥ث ا١لؽٞات ٘ٮ ٤ٓا١شث االعخالت ا٫١ٰٟ٢ٰث٘ ٮ ـ٬ق ا١ٓؽاق ١الوراق ا٥١ا١ٰث " ٤ش٢ث دراـات ٤طاـتٰث و٤ا١ٰث ،ا١ٓػد 17 ،سا٤ٓث

ةٖػاد ، ا١ٓؽاق، 2011 ،ص 137 -170.

- ،ع١٬ث ْتػ ا١ط٥ٰػ، "دور ض٬ٞ٥ث ا١لؽٞات ٘ٮ أرـاء االـؿ ا١ٓ٥٢ٰث ١ٓ٠٥ ا١لؽٞات

ا٥١فا٪٥ث ٘ٮ ا١ٓؽاق "٤ش٢ث ا١ٖؽي ٢١ٓ٬٢م االٛخهادٯث واألدارٯث، ا١ٓػد 25 ،ا٥١ش٢ػ 8 ، سا٤ٓث ةاة٠ ، ا١ٓؽاق ، 2012 ،ص 55-72.

- ٬ ،٤ط٥ػ ٧اٯٗ، "اذؽ ا١ط٬ٞ٥ث ٘ٮ ا٬٥٨١٘ ٮ ُ٠ اٛخهاد ا٥١ٓؽ٘ث دراـث ٘ٮ االٛخهاد

ا١ّراٛٮ وا١ػول ا٥١شاورة", دراـات االٛ٢ٰ٥ٰث ، ا١ٓػد 26 ،ا٥١ش٢ػ 26 ،سا٤ٓث ا٬٥١ن٠ ، .144 -121 ص، 2012 ،ؽاقٓ١

- ا١شازي ،ْ٥ؽ ٤ل٬٫ر ضػٯرث، "ض٬ٞ٥ث ا١لؽٞات ٘ٮ االردن " ، 2011 www.jcdr.com/pdf/hawkamat

- data world bank, The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI),www.govindicators.org

- Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi. «Response to: «The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Six, One, or None».» World Bank: 2010, <http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/ResponseKL.pd

—Kaufmann ,Danial, and, kraay, Arat, Governance Indicators: Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going?" The World Bank Research Observer, Oxford University Press, vol. 23, no. 1 , 2008, PP :2- 30.

-Khan,Mushtaq,H, "Governance, Economic Growthand Development since the 1960s",Ecoinimc and Social Affairs, United Nations,, No 45, 2007,PP: 2-22.

- Kpoor . M n, Meas, and, , Lindgreen, Roos, "On the governance of information: Introducing a new concept of governance to support the management of information," International Journal of Information Management, Vol 31, NO3.2011,PP 195-200,.

- radhan,Rudra,and,Sanyal,G," Good governance and human development: Evidence form Indian States," Journal of Social and Development Science,Vol 1,No1 ,2011, PP:1-8.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-24

How to Cite

الودرسة الوساغدة وفاء صتاح خدر. (2021). The Effect of Governance Indicators on Economic Growth (Case Study) The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. QALAAI ZANIST JOURNAL, 2(5), 699–719. https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.2.5.29

Issue

Section

Articles