The Basic Basic Symmetry Between Ersto and Descartes
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The project goes on to have two types of models and a human thinking system, each with its own context and history. The first is Aristo, a teacher, and the second is Descartes, the father of modern Europe and enlightenment. The range between the two philosophers is about 2,000 years. But at the same time, their thinking is far from each other. One of them has its own method, and it has its own goals and achievements. In this study, with the method of analysis-comparison, our project begins to examine similar and different dimensions. The structure of the study includes three parts, with several basic axis; as follows: In the first part, an introduction to metaphysics is opened as a quick introduction. Then in the first part, Greek mythology is discussed by natural philosophers.
In this section, the metaphysic opinions of Arsto teacher Plato are mentioned that in some places he criticized the criticism and in some places he was strongly abiding. In the second part, the meaning and definitions of methology will be highlighted by Arsto and then the basics of four reasons and movements will be discussed.
In the third part of the study, which focuses on Descartes, he points to the basic methaphysics in Descartes' view: he is dealing with suspicion as a means of establishing methaphysics. Then, through methodical suspicion, he reaches the road to certainty and establishes Kojito as the famous philosopher. God gives the middle as the core of the high esteemed one. As a result, the points of the conflict will be made
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Qalaai Zanist Journal allows the author to retain the copyright in their articles. Articles are instead made available under a Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use research provided the author is correctly attributed.
Creative Commons is a licensing scheme that allows authors to license their work so that others may re-use it without having to contact them for permission