The right of the federal territories to independence: Kurdistan Region is a model
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.3.1.20##semicolon##
Federalism, secession, territories, constitutional rights, federal authority, specialtiesپوختە
The topic of our study is considered a very critical constitutional issue within the framework of the federal state. The study is an effort to shed light on the right of federal regions to independence as well as the issue of creating a sort of compromise between such a right and the principle of federalism sustainability in the light of the currently emerging developments and principles in the field of comparative constitutional law in addition to the provisions of the judgments passed by the institutions of Constitutional and Judicial review. The significance of this subject does not simply lie in the principle of its being a counter solution in the face of the federal authority's tyranny under the guise of the principle of federalism sustainability which allows the federal government to resort to a broad interpretation of the constitutional competencies and practice a kind of favoritism in favor of one region at the expense of another. It is rather an essential tool to maintain the vertical constitutional balance, as well as the need for
conditional recognition of the right of federal regions to independence. To ensure that the study covers all matters and ideas relevant to its topic, I have divided it into three chapters with an introductory section for the objective of clarifying the concept of federal regions to independence and distinguishing it from the other confusing concepts among which are some common overlapping terms such as "Nullification" and the term of "Secession". In the first chapter, I have discussed the basis of the right of the federal regions to independence (the philosophical basis, the legal basis). While in the second chapter, I have covered the point of view of jurisprudence and the judiciary regarding the right of the federal regions to independence. As for the third chapter, it is rather a theoretical and practical topic that demonstrates the legality of the right of Kurdistan Region to independence. Finally, I have ended the study with a concluding section where I have stated the conclusions that I have reached in the course of the study and have also included some recommendations.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
سەرچاوەکان
ٌ٘ .راق األًٌ اىٍخطػة
ٌٓ .اْػة ـ٘فؽ ْٖ ٌٓاْػة اىفبلم اىخٖ حً اىخٔكّ٘ ْي٘ٓا فٖ 10 أغفٍؿ 1920.
.كؽار اىشٍٓ٘ث اىٓاٌث ىؤلًٌ اىٍخطػة ركً )1514 )اىهادر فٖ نأُن األول 1960.
.كؽار اىشٍٓ٘ث اىٓاٌث ىؤلًٌ اىٍخطػة اىٍؽكً )2625 )ىٓام 1970.
.كؽار )ْيٖ ضفَ ٌش٘ػ( اىتؽك٘ث اىهادرة ٌِّ واىٍؽكٍث 38/2950 فٖ 3/6/1987.
.1991/4/5 ٖف 688 كؽار. 6
.كؽار ٌطهٍث اىٓػل اىػوى٘ث فٖ 22/7/2010.
.اىخلؽٗؽ االـخؽاح٘شٖ اىٓؽةٖ ىٓام 1991 ،اىٍلهيث اىهٔردٗث واىٍٍٔضات اىخؽن٘ث، ٌؽنؾ األْؽام ىيػر اـات اىف٘اـ٘ث
واالـخؽاح٘ش٘ث، اىلاْؽة، 1992.
.اْبلن االحطاد اىفػراىٖ فٖ ةؽوحٔنٔالت اىٍشيؿ اىٌِٖٔ ىهٔردـخان اىٓؽاق 1992 ،اىٍشيػ األول، اىٍتٓث األوىٕ.
.اْبلن االحطاد اىفػراىٖ اىؼي اكؽه اىٍشيؿ اىٌِٖٔ إلكيً٘ نٔردـخان اىٓؽاق فٖ 4/10/1992 ،ةؽوحٔنٔالت اىٍشيؿ اىٌِٖٔ
ىهٔردـخان اىٓؽاق، اىٍشيػ اىراىد، اىٍتٓث اىهٔردٗث، 1997.
.إْبلن اىٍؤحٍؽ اىٓاىٍٖ ىطلٔق اإلُفان )14 -25 / ضؾٗؽان/1993.
.اىػـخٔر اىٓؽاكٖ اىٍؤكج ىٓام 1958.
.دـخٔر سٍٓٔرٗث اىٓؽاق ىٓام 2005.
.دـخٔر سٍٓٔرٗث اىٍهف٘م ىٓام 1917.
.دـخٔر سٍٓٔرٗث اىتؽازٗو ىٓام 1988.
.دـخٔر سٍٓٔرٗث إـتاُ٘ا ىٓام 1978.
.دـخٔر سٍٓٔرٗث األرسِخَ٘ ىٓام 1853 ، أْ٘ػ اىٍٓو ةّ ْام 1983 ، حٓػٗبلحّ ىغاٗث ْام 1994.
Florentina Harbo, Secession Right - an Anti - Federal Principle, Comparative Study of Federal State and The EU, Journal of politics and Law, Norwegian Institute for Strategic Studies, Vol. 1.No. 3, September 2008.
James Crawford, State practice and International Law in relation to Unilateral Secession , Report to Government of Canada Concerned Unilateral secession of Quebec, 19 February 1997.
William H. Riker, The Development of American Federalism, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987.
##submission.downloads##
بڵاو کرایەوە
چۆنییەتی بەکارهێنانی سەرچاوە
ژمارە
بەش
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc-sa4.footer##Qalaai Zanist Journal allows the author to retain the copyright in their articles. Articles are instead made available under a Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use research provided the author is correctly attributed.
Creative Commons is a licensing scheme that allows authors to license their work so that others may re-use it without having to contact them for permission