A Sociolinguistic Study of Female Language with Reference to English and Kurdish

Sangar Othman Ibrahim

doi:10.25212/lfu.qzj.8.3.47

توێژەران

Sangar Othman Ibrahim Department of English, College of Languages, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.8.3.47

##semicolon##

Tag-Questions, Hypercorrect Grammar, Interruption, Super Polite Form and Rising Intonation.

پوختە

The main aims of this study are to point out whether some aspects of language such as ‘‘hedges and fillers, tag-questions, hypercorrect grammar, interruption, soft swear words emphatic stress, super polite form, intensifiers, empty adjectives and rising intonation’’, which are indicated by Lakoff, are used by females of English and Kurdish societies for different purposes or not, and if the level of literacy of females has any effect of them in using or not. To collect data, an open-ended questionnaire is used for collecting data from 70 senior Kurdish female students at Salahaddin University/ College of Languages/ English Department and 70 senior English female students at University of Leicester/ School of English. Both sides of the participants were asked to express their views on the same 10 statements. The researcher employed a mixed-methodologies technique that used quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze the data that was collected. The current study concluded that both sides of participants use most of the selected aspects of language for different purposes and the level of literacy of females has some effects on them in communication because through the process of education people can learn how to use the aspects of their language correctly.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

سەرچاوەکان

Bennett, A. (1981). Interruptions and the Interpretation of Conversation. Discourse Processes. 4/2, 171-88.

Brown, P. (1980). How and Why Women More Polite: Some Evidence from a Mayan Community. In Women and Language in Literature and Society. ed., by McConnell-Ginet, Borker and Furman, New York: Praeger.

Coates, J. (1988). Women´s Speech, Women´s Strength? Longman: Harlow.

Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Falk, J. (1980). The Conversational Duet. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 507-14. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

Fishman, P. (1998). Conversational Insecurity. The Feminist Critique of Language. 2nd ed, London: Routledge, pp. 253-8.

Githens, S. (2016). Men & Women in Conversation: an Analysis of Gender Styles in Language. USA: Michigan University.

Holmes J (1993). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: UK Longman.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.

Oktapiani, T. Natsir, M. & Setyowati, R. (2017). Women’s Language Features Found in Female Character’s Utterances in the Devil Wears Prada Movie. Journal Ilmu Budaya, 1 (3), pp. 207-220.

Pan, Q. (2011). On the Features of Female Language in English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (8), pp. 1015-1018.

Putra, B., A. & Prayudha, P.( 2019). The Analysis of Women and Men Language Features on America’s Got Talent. Indonesia: Universities of Ahmad Dahlan.

Tannen, D. (1994). Interpreting Interruption in Coversation. Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.

Trudgill, P. (1983b). On Dialect: social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Brasil Blackwell.

Wilamova, S. (2005). On Expressing Negative Politeness in English Fictional Discourse.

Wodak, M. (2019).Validity and Reliability. New York: Roultladge.

Xia, X. 2013. Gender Differences in Using Language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3 (8), pp. 1485-1489. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.8.1485-1489.

Zimmerman, D. H. & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation. Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, ed., by Thorne and Henley, 105-29. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House