The possibility to apply the democratic peace theory as a solution for disputes between the KRG and Iraq

Qaraman Mohammed Hasan

doi:10.25212/lfu.qzj.3.2.34

المؤلفون

Qaraman Mohammed Hasan Lecturer, Department of Legal Administration, Law and International Relations College, Lebanese French University (LFU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.3.2.34

الكلمات المفتاحية:

democratic peace, dispute, federal government, Kurdistan Region, Referendum, Relationship, Power, International institutions, liberal theory,، cooperation, National sphere

الملخص

Democratic peace thesis expresses the essential principles of liberalism in many areas, but the most significant elements are power of individuals, international institutions and economic cooperation. This theory is a significant attempt to solve issues related to war and peace between states. This theory may account as tool for solving disputes between federal government in Iraq and the Kurdistan Region, if elements of the theory apply properly. While, Iraqi Kurdistan's referendum in 25th of September
2017 reignited many disputes between Baghdad and Erbil, there is a possibility to solve these issues peacefully. This paper argues that, if both sides practice democracy, there will be peace and prosperity between them. Therefore, the paper illustrates democratic peace theory by focusing on relationship between liberal theory and democracy in the first part of the research. The second part of the paper applies the democratic peace theory in three major areas regarding relationship between Baghdad and Erbil. Firstly, it explains the role of individuals and power of citizens in democratic states. Secondly, role of international institutions as a core point in liberal theory. Finally, it also illustrates the role of economic cooperation for achieving peace between states in national sphere.

التنزيلات

بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.

المراجع

ABD-EL-MOOTY, M., KANSOH, R. & ABDULHADI, A. 2016. Challenges of Water Resources in Iraq. Hydrol Current Res, 7, 2.

BAYLIS, J., SMITH, S. & OWENS, P. 2013. The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations, Oxford University Press, 113-114.

DEUDNEY, D. & IKENBERRY, G. J. 2017. Realism, Liberalism and the Iraq War. Survival, 59, 7-26.

DIXON, W. J. 1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review, 88, 14-32.

FERGUSON, N. 2003. Hegemony or empire? Foreign Affairs, 154-161.

FUKUYAMA, F. 2006. Identity, immigration, and liberal democracy. Journal of democracy, 17,

FUKUYAMA, F. 2006. The end of history and the last man, Simon and Schuster.

FUKUYAMA, F. 2015. Why is democracy performing so poorly? Journal of Democracy, 26, 11-20.

HESS, G. D. & ORPHANIDES, A. 2001. War and democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 109, 776-

HEVIAN, R. 2013. THE MAIN KURDISH POLITICAL PARTIES IN IRAN, IRAQ, SYRIA, AND TURKEY: A

RESEARCH GUIDE. MERIA Journal, 17.

HUNTINGTON, S. P. 1993. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century,

University of Oklahoma press.

ISAKHAN, B. 2014. Protests and public power in post-Saddam Iraq: the case of the Iraqi

federation of oil union. Informal power in the greater Middle East: hidden geographies, 117-128.

ISH‐SHALOM, P. 2008. Theorization, Harm, and the Democratic Imperative: Lessons from the

Politicization of the Democratic‐Peace Thesis. International Studies Review, 10, 680-692.

JACKSON, R. & SøRENSEN, G. 2015. Introduction to international relations: theories and

approaches, Oxford university press.

JAGGERS, K. & GURR, T. R. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal

of Peace Research, 32, 469-482.

JAWAD, S. 2013. The Iraqi constitution: structual flaws and political implications.

JONES, D. M., BREMER, S. A. & SINGER, J. D. 1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15, 163-213.

KANT, I. 1996. Toward perpetual peace. Practical philosophy, 8, 836

KATZMAN, K. Iraq: Politics, Governance, and Human Rights. 2012. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON DC CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE.

LAWSON, S. 2003. A Short Introduction to International Relations, Polity Press; Malden, MA: Blackwell, 39-41.

LEWIS, B. 1993. Islam and liberal democracy. ATLANTIC-BOSTON-, 271, 89-89.

LUARD, E. 1992. Basic texts in international relations: the evolution of ideas about international society, Macmillan, 95-98.

MCGARRY, J. & O’LEARY, B. 2007. Iraq's Constitution of 2005: Liberal consociation as political prescription. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5, 670-698.

MAOZ, Z. & RUSSETT, B. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace. American Political Science Review, 87, 624-38.

ONEAL, J. R. & RUSSETT, B. 1999. The Kantian peace: The pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885–1992. World Politics, 52, 1-37.

O’NEILL, T. & HYMEL, G. 1994. All politics is local. London: Crown.

OWEN, J. M. 1994. How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security, 19, 87- 125.

RAHEEM, H. K. Freedom to Trade Internationally and Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business. The Economic Freedom of Iraq, 75.

SHAKIR, F. 2017. The Iraqi Federation: Origin, Operation and Significance, Taylor & Francis.

SHUKOR, A. R., KLAZINGA, N. S. & KRINGOS, D. S. 2017. Primary care in an unstable security, humanitarian, economic and political context: the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. BMC health services research, 17, 592.

SUGANAMI, H. 1989. The domestic analogy and world order proposals, Cambridge University Press, 110-113.

SCHUMPETER, J. A. 2013. Capitalism, socialism and democracy, Routledge.

ZAKARIA, F. 1997. The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign affairs, 22-43.