The influence of methodological trends of accounting research for the period (1926 - 2019) in the formulation and construction of accounting theory
Analytical exploratory study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.5.1.23الكلمات المفتاحية:
Methodological trends of accounting research, Accounting theory، Accounting researches approaches، Normative approach، Positive approach.الملخص
Accounting researches during the period (1926 - 2019) contributed to the development of accounting through the study، analysis and discussion of many emerging topics in accounting، whether the subjects related to the intellectual philosophical side، or what related to the application side related to accounting practices and procedures that applied by professional accountants. Based on its analysis، discussion and construction of its assumptions and proof it on one of the two prevailing approaches in accounting which are: (Normative approach) having deductive roots، and (Positive approach) having inductive roots. The research problem come out in the query about the effect resulting from the change in the accounting research methodology during the period (1926–2019) from its reliance on the standard procedure and its transition to the postural approach on the formulation and construction of accounting theory، and the effect of this transition on the possibility of reaching to the acceptable and comprehensive accounting theory، and that was done through analyzing the methodological trends of accounting research published in the most important journals representing the accounting community in the world (TAR، CAR، JAR، AOS)، and then analyzing the reasons for this transition or change and its impact on the possibility of getting an acceptable and comprehensive accounting theory by building a basic assumption for the research which is: The shift in the direction of accounting research approaches from the normative approach (as a prevailing approach) During the period (1926-1968) to the positive approach (as a prevailing approach) during the period (1968 - 2019) have a negative effect on the attempts to formulate and construct the acceptable and comprehensive accountancy theory، which is an assumptions that its validity was proved (based on the results of the analysis of the questions contained in the questionnaire form prepared for this research)، where the researchers reached a number of conclusions، whereas the most important one is that this transition led to creating a number of partial and superficial accounting theories، in addition to the dissolution of accounting as an independent knowledge field in the vessels of science and other knowledge fields، which led to the inability to develop the theory of accounting or reaching to the acceptable and comprehensive accounting theory.
التنزيلات
المراجع
AL- Adeem، Khalid Rasheed، (2010)، "Accounting Theory : A Neglected Topic in Academic Accounting Research"، PhD. Theses، Case Western Reserve University.
Badua، F.، Previts، G. John، & Vasarhelyi، M.، (2011)، "Tracing the Development of Accounting Thought by Analyzing Content، Communication، and Quality in Accounting Research Over Time"، Accounting Historians Journal، Vol. 38، No. 1، PP. 31 – 56.
Baker، C. R.، (2017) ، "The Influence of Accounting Theory on The FASB Conceptual Framework"، Accounting Historians Journal، Vol. 44، No. 20، Dec. PP. 109-124.
Chambers، R. J.، (1995)، "An Accounting Thesaurus : 500 Years of Accounting"، Oxford : PERGAMON.
Erserim، Alper، (2016)، "Intellectual Structure of Accounting Research : A Historical Review on the Journal of Accounting Organization Society"، Accounting and Finance Research، Vol. 5، No. 2، PP. 1-9.
Gaffikin، Michael، (2007)، "Accounting Research and Theory : The Age of Neo-Empiricism"، The Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal، Feb. Vol. 1، No. 1، PP. 1-19.
Granof، M. H.، & Zeff، S. A.، (2008)، "Research on Accounting Should Learn From The Past"، The Chronicle of Higher Education، 54 (28) : A 34.
Heck، J. & Jensen، B.، (2007)، "An analysis of the evolution of research contributions by The Accounting Review، 1926-2005"، Accounting Historians Journal، December، 34، 2، PP. 109-142.
Hopwood، G.، Anthony، (2007)، "Whither Accounting Research ?"، The Accounting Review، Vol. 82، No. 5، PP. 1365 – 1374.
Kabir M. Humayun، (2010)، "Positive Accounting Theory and Scince"، Journal of Centrum Cathedra، Vol. 3، Issu. 2، PP. 136 – 149.
Mattessich، R.، (1972)، "Methodological precondition and problems of a general theory of accounting"، The Accounting Review، Jul.، 47، 3، 469-487.
Nakayama S.، (1984)، "Academic and Scientific Traditions in China، Japan، and West"، University of Tokyo Press، Translated By (Jery Dusenbury).
Oler، D. K.، Oler، M. J.، & Skousen، C. J.، (2008)، "Characterizing accounting research "، Social Science Network Research (SSRN)، Working Paper Series، April 17، Available at SSRN.
Rayburn، J. D.، (2005)، "President's message Accounting Education News"، Fall. 33 (4) : 1 – 4. Sarasota، FL : American Accounting Association.
Rodgers L. Jacci & Williams F. Paul، (1996)، "Patterns of Research Productivity and Knowledge Creation at the Accounting Review 1967 – 1993 "، The Accounting Historians Journal، Vol. 23، No. 1، PP. 51 – 88.
Smith، M.، (2003)، "Research methods in accounting"، Fourth Edition، London : SAGE Publication Ltd.
Watts، R. L.، & Zimmerman، J. L.، (1986)، "Positive Accounting Theory"، Englewood Cliffs، New Jersey، Prentice Hall Inc. PP. 3-14.
Watts، R.، (1995)، "Developments in Positive Accounting Theory"، in Jones at al. PP. 297 – 353.
Wolk، H. I.، Dodd، J. L.، & Teamey، M. G.، (2004)، "Accounting theory : Conceptual Issues in a political and economic environment"، 6th ed. Mason، OH : Thomson South-Western.
Yu، S. C.، (1976)، "The Structure of Accounting Theory"، Gainesville، FL : The University Press of Florida.
Zeff، S. A.، (1989)، "Recent trends in accounting education and research in the USA : Some implication for UK academics"، British Accounting Review، 21، 159-176
Zeff، S. A.، (1999) ، "The evolution of the conceptual framework for business enterprises in the United States"، Accounting Historians Journal، 26، 2، 89-131
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2020 Maher Ali Hussain Shamam, Ahmed Mohammed Khalel
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Qalaai Zanist Journal allows the author to retain the copyright in their articles. Articles are instead made available under a Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use research provided the author is correctly attributed.
Creative Commons is a licensing scheme that allows authors to license their work so that others may re-use it without having to contact them for permission