Electronic media discourse about the 2017 referendum in the kurdistan region the k24 website as a sample
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The study aims to identify the most important frameworks and topics used in the electronic media discourse during the media campaign for the 2017 referendum. This study is a descriptive study that uses a media survey method based on the content analysis. The electronic news websites represent the study community. The K24 website has selected as a sample of the study. (90) news stories were analyzed over the course of the campaign, which lasted for a month, among the most important findings of the study: that the discourse of the study sample was biased for the referendum, and that the frameworks most used in the study sample coverage of the campaign are the liability and conflict framework.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Qalaai Zanist Journal allows the author to retain the copyright in their articles. Articles are instead made available under a Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use research provided the author is correctly attributed.
Creative Commons is a licensing scheme that allows authors to license their work so that others may re-use it without having to contact them for permission