Appearance and Reality in King Lear

Authors

  • Mariwan Hwayyiz Rustum Department of English, College of Education and Languages, Lebanese French University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.7.4.47

Keywords:

mask, reality, deceives, appearance, tragedy

Abstract

With fictional characters, every situation in life has its appearance and reality. The looks of things are sometimes what we would like to work out. The fact, what actually happens, isn't always clear to the observer. Folks that cannot break through the superficial appearance of things will only see what they require to believe. The fact during this situation is usually unattractive to the perceiver. These are the circumstances surrounding the conflict that transpire in William Shakespeare's fictional character. As an audience, you discover there's an enormous character flaw within the characters of King Lear and Earl of Gloucester. Within the story, neither of those two men manages to create the difference, in their minds, between what the people say and do, and what are the important motives of those two people behind their actions. This permits Lear and Gloucester to betray their own blood, becoming isolated from people who have their best interests inside. It's the lack to differentiate between appearance and reality that causes Lear and Gloucester to fall. In fictitious character, appearance or reputation determines the character. Edgar says lots in his soliloquy, when he disguises himself as poor Tom.

There's a transparent contradiction between reality versus appearance. Reality is that the world or state of things as they really exist, Appearance could be a fantasy, and reality may be a gospel. In fiction, there are many characters that appear like they're not really. Since one cannot see the personality of the opposite, you'll be able to never identify someone for who they really are.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, D. (1978) Nominalism and Realism: Universals and Scientific Realism, volume I .Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Angere, S. (2010). Theory and Reality: Metaphysics as Second Science, Oxford Press.

Bradley F H, (1893). '' Appearance and Reality'': (London: George Allen and Unwin)

Bennett, J. W. (1962). "The Storm Within: The Madness of Lear": Shakespeare Quartely Oxford.

Basil Blackwell (1987). ''Appearance and Reality'': A Philosophical Investigation into Perception and Perceptual Qualities: Oxford University Press.

Daniel Lee Burcham (1966). Literary Criticism of Shakespeare's King Lear: Eastern Illinois University.

Dodd, Julian (2001). ''Is Truth Supervenient on Being?" Proceedings of the

Aristotelian Society: 102:69¬ - 86.

F. H. Bradley (1897). ''Appearance and Reality'': 2nd ed. b. 30/01/1846, London

Gadamer, H.-G. (1960/1989) ''Truth and Method'', 2nd ed., trans. J. Weinsheimer and D. Marshall. New York: Continuum.

Gareth and McDowell, John (1976). ''Truth and Meaning": Oxford University Press.

Hobson, J. (2002) Dreaming: ''An Introduction to the Science of Sleep''. Oxford

University Press.

Neil Tennant (1987). ''Anti-Realism and Logic'': Truth as Eternal: Clarendon Press.

Nicholas Rescher. (2010). '' Reality and its appearance'': Series Editor: James Fieser, University of Tennessee at Martin, USA.

Russell, Bertrand. (1912). “Appearance and Reality” In Problems of Philosophy: New York: Henry Holt & Co.).

Stauffer, Donald (1949). ''A Shakespeare's World of Images'': New York: W. W, Norton

Searle, J.R. (1997). ''The mystery of consciousness'': London: Granta.

Wells, S. (2015) “William Shakespeare: A Very Short Introduction”. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Wilson, Harold. S. (1957). ''On the Design of Shakespearean Tragedy'': Canada. University of Toronto press.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Mariwan Hwayyiz Rustum. (2022). Appearance and Reality in King Lear. QALAAI ZANIST JOURNAL, 7(4), 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.7.4.47

Issue

Section

Articles