The Importance of Triangulation Methodology in Sociology

توێژەران

  • Dana Lateef Shwani Department of Sociology, College of Law and International Relations, Lebanese French University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.6.2.10

##semicolon##

Method, Quality Method, Quantative Method, Mixed Method, Triangulation Methodology

پوختە

In sociology, mixed methods are considered in the third part of the methodology. This means that to develop research methods in social sciences, researchers rely on qualitative methods, and then turn to quantitative, but these days the way mixed methods have become a common part of the social sciences and given the greatest value. The main idea of the mixed method is express the multiplicity of multi-method, which means that the use of quality and quantify will lead to a more appropriate and comprehensive understanding of this research phenomenon, as done in this group that solves the quality and quantifyof the research. Moreover, in the new world, the complexity of the fields, in this regard, analysis, now and resonant, needs to be used and used in a detailed and new methodology, so that the greatest space and gap can be left. For this reason, the main purpose of this research is to discuss a quantifyand quality methods, and then to analyze the triangulation methodology in the social sciences and the importance of this methodology to the scientific centers in Kurdistan.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

سەرچاوەکان

Reid, w. (1997). conception of curriculum and paradigms for research, journal of curriculum and supervision, 12.

Newman,W. L. (2000). social research methods, Boston, Allyn and bacon.

Blaukie, W.H. (1991). a critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality and Quantity, volume 25, issue 1.

Bouchard, T. (1976). Unobtrusive measures: An inventory of uses, sociological methods and research, volume 4.

Smith, W.H. (1975). strategies of social research: The methodological imagination. Englewood cliffs, prentice Hall.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research Act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, New York, McGraw-Hill.

Olsen, W. (2004). developments in sociology, causeway press, Ahlborn.

Hussein, A. (2001). The use of triangulation in social sciences research, Journal of comparative social work, issue 1.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in Conducting a Scholarly Mixed Methods Study, DBER Speaker Series.

Yasmin, S. (2012). Triangulation: Research method as the tool of social science research, BUP journal, volume 1, issue 1.

Thurmond, V. A. (2001) the point of triangulation, journal of nursing scholarships, volume 33, issue 3.

ایمان، م.ت. (2009). مبنانی پارادایمی روش های تحقیق كمی و كیفی در علوم انسانی،تهران، پژوهشگاه‌ حوزه‌ و دانشگا.

چالمرز، ا. ف. (2000). چیستی علم، (ترجمه‌ سعید زیبا كلام)، تهران، انتشارات سمات.

حافظ نیا، م. (2003). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحیقیق در علوم انسانی، تهران، انتشارات سمت.

نیازی، م. (2011). روشهای تحقیق تلفیقی، مجله‌ مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، دوره‌ پنج، شماره‌ 2.

مدنی، سید احمد و، دكتر نصر، احمد ڕضا. (2009). سه‌سوسازی: ڕاهبردی برای نواوری در پژوهش های اموزشی، فصلنامه‌ نواوری اموزشی، شماره‌ 30، سال هشتم.

##submission.downloads##

بڵاو کرایەوە

2021-06-30

ژمارە

بەش

Articles

ئەو توێژینەوانەی ئەم نوسەرە کە زۆرترین جار خوێندراونەتەوە.