The typology of constitutions and the Imposed constitution
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.8.2.40پوختە
One of the main challenges that faces any scholar or researcher after defining any legal term is how and why to organise them in different categories. Imposed constitutions as a new term which has lately attracted many researchers tends to be shown as an alien to the classic and traditional types of known constitutions. The main challenge which prompts quickly after hearing this term is if there are imposed constitutions, so what are the un-imposed ones? In This article focuses on finding a place for the imposed constitutions by clarifying that the imposed constitution is a stand-alone type that does not have a counterpart as its name may suggest.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
سەرچاوەکان
Brandt M, ‘Constitutional Assistance in Post-Conflict Countries: The UN Experience: Cambodia, East Timor and Afghanistan’ [2005] United Nations Development Programme
Cheremnov ID, ‘CLASSIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONS’ Рекомендовано до друку рішенням Вченої ради Харківського національного університету імені ВН Каразіна (протокол № 2 від 24 лютого 2014р.) 27
Craig PP, ‘Written and Unwritten Constitutions: The Modality of Change’ [2021] Pragmatism, Principle, and Power in Common Law Constitutional Systems: Essays in Honour of Bruce Harris, Forthcoming
Elkins Z and Ginsburg T, ‘What Can We Learn from Written Constitutions?’ (2021) 24 Annual Review of Political Science 321
Elkins Z, Ginsburg T and Melton J, The Endurance of National Constitutions (Cambridge University Press 2009)
Galligan DJ and Versteeg M, ‘Theoretical Perspectives on the Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions’ [2013] Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions 3
Grimm D, Constitutionalism: Past, Present, and Future (oxford university press 2016)
Hardin R, ‘Why a Constitution’ [2013] Social and political foundations of constitutions 51
Hobbes T and Tuck R, ‘Leviathan (Rev. Ed.)’ (1996) 433 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (First published 1651). Lieberman, E., Hauert, C., & Nowak, MA (2005). Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature 7023
King A, The British Constitution (OUP Oxford 2007)
Lindseth PL, ‘The Paradox of Parliamentary Supremacy: Delegation, Democracy, and Dictatorship in Germany and France, 1920s-1950s’ (2003) 113 Yale LJ 1341
Lutz DS, Principles of Constitutional Design (Cambridge university press 2006)
Machiavelli N, ‘The Prince’ (2004) 1 YOUTH 1
Marmor A, ‘Are Constitutions Legitimate?’ (2007) 20 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 69
Tushnet M, ‘Constitution-Making: An Introduction’ (2012) 91 Tex. L. Rev. 1983
Tushnet MV, Fleiner T and Saunders C, Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law (Routledge USA 2013)
##submission.downloads##
بڵاو کرایەوە
چۆنییەتی بەکارهێنانی سەرچاوە
ژمارە
بەش
##submission.license##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##Qalaai Zanist Journal allows the author to retain the copyright in their articles. Articles are instead made available under a Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use research provided the author is correctly attributed.
Creative Commons is a licensing scheme that allows authors to license their work so that others may re-use it without having to contact them for permission