Speech act analysis of David Mamet’s American Buffalo

Firdaus Sleman Hamad; Suhayla H. Majeed

doi:10.25212/lfu.qzj.4.4.41

توێژەران

Firdaus Sleman Hamad College of languages-English deparment/Salahaddin university
Suhayla H. Majeed

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.4.4.41

##semicolon##

Speech act theory Pragmtics taxonomy of speech acts and drama

پوختە

Speech act is the usage of words and sentences that commits the speaker or the hearer to do something. Searle group’s speech acts into five categories, which are assertives, directives, commisives, expressives and declarativies. This paper aims at analyzing the categories of speech acts in the play ‘ American buffalo’ by david mamet.it aims to find the types and the functions of the speech acts and the difference between them.This is done through analyzing four texts of the characters’ dialogues.through which we can understand the sophisticated personalities of the different characters. The analysis is carried out from a pragmatic point of view, mainly on the basis of the typology prposed by Searle (1969).

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

سەرچاوەکان

Al-Sulaimaan, M. M. D. (2011): Semantics and Pragmatics, Mosul: Daar Ibn AL – Atheer Li AL – Tibaa’ti Wa Al – Nashr.

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

Ballmer, T. and Brennenstuhl, W. (1981). Speech act classification. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Birner, B. (2013). Introduction to pragmatics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Bliss, C., 1983. Writing as Action: Using Speech Act Theory in the Composition Classroom.

Brown, P., Levinson, S.C. and Levinson, S.C., 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press.

Dörge, F.C., 2006. Illocutionary acts: Austin's account and what Searle made out of it.

Fotion, N. (2014). John Searle. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Jucker and Taavitsainen, 2008), A. and Taavitsainen, I. (2008). Speech acts in the history of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

Hancher, M., 1979. The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts. Language in society, 8(1), pp.1-14

Horn, L.R. and Gregory Ward (eds.) (2006). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press

Hurford, J. and Heasley, B. (1990). Semantics. [online] Google Books. Available at: https://books.google.com/books/about/Semantics.html?id=WZVr3ctwYs0C [Accessed 22 Jan. 2019].

Kaburise, P. (2011). Speech Act Theory and Communication: A Univen Study. [ebook] Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Available at: https://books.google.iq/books? [Accessed 17 Jan. 2019].

Kock, L.J., 1997. The drama of Senkatana by SM Mofokeng: a speech act exploration (Doctoral dissertation).

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman Group Ltd.

Leech, G. and Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1983): Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mey, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

Poythress, V.S., 2008. Canon and speech act: limitations in speech-act theory, with implications for a putative theory of canonical speech acts. Westminster Theological Journal, 70, pp.337-354

Sadock, J., 2004. Speech acts. Handbook of pragmatics, pp.53-73.

Sbisà, M. (1994): "Language and Dialogue in the Framework of the Analytic Philosophy of Ordinary Language. In Weigand, E (ed.), Concepts of Dialogue, pp. 159-169Searle, J. R. (1969): Speech Act Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiffman, H. (n.d.). Speech Acts and Conversation. [Online] Sas.upenn.edu. Available at:

https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/edling/handouts/speechacts/spchax2 .html [Accessed 29 Feb. 2019].

Schiffrin, A., 2005. Modelling speech acts in conversational discourse (Doctoral dissertation, Un1iversity of Leeds

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge U.P.

Searle, J.R., 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press

Searle, John R., Ferenc Kiefer, and Manfred Bierwisch, eds. Speech act theory and pragmatics. Vol. 10. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1980.

Searle, J. R. and Vanderveken, D. (1985): Foundations of the Illocutionary Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, P.W.H., 1991. Speech act theory, discourse structure and indirect speech (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).

Tiersma, P.M., 1986. The language of offer and acceptance: Speech acts and the question of intent. Calif. L. Rev., 74, p.189.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman Group Limited.

Verschueren, J., 2008. Context and structure in a theory of pragmatics. Studies in Pragmatics, 10, pp.13-23.

Yule, G. (2010). The study of language. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press.

Zaefferer, D., 2001. Deconstructing a classical classification: A typological look at Searle's concept of illocution type. Revue internationale de philosophie, (2), pp.209-225