The Competences of Kurdistan Region Employees Disciplinary Committee and appealing its provisions.

Authors

  • امىدرس امدكخِر وُدي خىدي وُدي ٞ٢ٰث ا١ٜا٬٧ن / سا٤ٓث ١٬٧ز
  • امىدرشث امىصاغدة ٌَد غتداألوير غنِش ٞ٢ٰث ا١ٜا٬٧ن / سا٤ٓث ١٬٧ز

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.3.1.29

Keywords:

-Disciplinary Committee -Service Rights -Cassation appeal.

Abstract

Employees Discipline Commission of the Iraqi Kurdistan region has two Jurisdictions. First, looking to appeals of employees’ civil services rights and its provisions are subjected to cassation appeal. Second, looking to the appeals of punishments issued under the Employees Discipline Law and its provisions is definite which is unjustified. so we proposed that all Commission's provisions be subject to cassation appeal regardless the matter of the judgment especially as some of the punishments, has a greater impact than certain service rights. We are in intention for strengthening employee's guarantees to achieve the balancing between the effectiveness of management and employee's guarantees. This research included suggestion to establish a high administrative court in the Kurdistan Region to undertake the jurisdictions of the General Assembly of the Region’s Shura Council as attributive cassation. Also the jurisdiction of appointing competent authority for appeared conflicts on jurisdiction between the Administrative Court and the Employees Discipline Commission. Additionally, to give jurisdiction to the Appointment competent authority Commission to look on jurisdiction’s conflict between Employees Discipline Commission and Civil Courts. As for the (15) days period of the cassation appeal is insufficient to study the judgment and then resort to appeal it or not.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

- ا١ٓتٰػي، ىا٦٤ ضفٰ٦ ،ا١ي٥ا٧ات ا١خأدٯتٰث ٬٥٢١ ُٗا١ٓام ٘ٮ ا١ٜا٬٧ن ا١ٓؽاٛٮ، أٌؽوضث دٞخ٬راه، ٞ٢ٰث ا١ٜا٬٧ن، سا٤ٓث ةٖػاد، 1991.

- ا١ؾ٪ٰؽي، ٫٤ػي ض٥ػي، ا٫٧اء ا١ٜٓ٬ةث اال٧يتاٌٰث ٬٥٢١ ُٗا١ٓام ٘ٮ ا١ٜا٬٧ن ا١ٓؽاٛٮ، دراـث ٤ٜار٧ث، ٞ٢ٰث ا١ٜا٬٧ن، سا٤ٓث ةٖػاد، 1998

- ا٥١تادئ ا١ٓا٤ث ١ٙخاوى وٛؽارات ٤ش٢ؿ ك٬رى إٛ٢ٰ٣ٞ ؽدـخان ا١ٓؽاق ١ٓام 2011 ،وزارة ا١ٓػل ٘ٮ إٛ٢ٰ٣ٞ ؽدـخان.

- ا٥١تادئ ا١ٓا٤ث ١ٙخاوى وٛؽارات ٤ش٢ؿ ك٬رى إٛ٢ٰ٣ٞ ؽدـخان ا١ٓؽاق ١ٓام 2012 ،وزارة ا١ٓػل ٘ٮ إٛ٢ٰ٣ٞ ؽدـخان.

- ا١تؽز٧شٮ، ْهام ْتػ ا٬١٪اب، ٤ش٢ؿ ك٬رى ا١ػو١ث و٤ٰالد ا١ٜياء اإلداري ٘ٮ ا١ٓؽاق، ةطد م ٧ل٬ر ٘ٮ ٤ش٢ث ا١ٓ٬٢م ا١ٜا٧٬٧ٰث، ا١ٓػد األول وا١را٧ٮ، ٞ٢ٰث ا١ٜا٬٧ن، سا٤ٓث ةٖػاد،1990.

- ا١ؾ٪ٰؽي، ٫٤ػي ض٥ػي، ا٫٧اء ا١ٜٓ٬ةث اال٧يتاٌٰث ةطٟ٣ ا١ٜا٬٧ن ٘ٮ ا١ٓؽاق، ةطد ٨٤ل٬ر ٘ٮ ٤ش٢ث دراـات ٛا٧٬٧ٰث، ةٰج ا١طٟ٥ث، ةٖػاد،2001

- دـخ٬ر ا١ٓؽاق ١ف٨ث 2005.

ٛ - ا٬٧ن ا٧يتاط ٬٤ُٙٮ ا١ػو١ث رٛ٣ 69 ١ف٨ث 1936.

ٛ - ا٬٧ن ا١غػ٤ث ا٥١ػ٧ٰث رٛ٣ 24 ١ف٨ث 1960.

ٛ - ا٬٧ن ٤ش٢ؿ ك٬رى ا١ػو١ث رٛ٣ 65 ١ف٨ث 1979.

ٛ - ا٬٧ن ا٧يتاط ٬٤ُٙٮ ا١ػو١ث وا١ٍٜاع ا١ٓام رٛ٣ 14 ١ف٨ث 1991.

ٛ - ا٬٧ن ٤ش٢ؿ ا١ل٬رى إلٛ٢ٰ٣ٞ ؽدـخان ا١ٓؽاق رٛ٣ 14 ١ف٨ث 2008.

- ا١ٜا٬٧ن رٛ٣ 5 ١ؿ٧ث 2008ٛ ،ا٬٧ن ا١خٓػٯ٠ األول ١ٜا٬٧ن ا٧يتاط ٬٤ُٙٮ ا١ػو١ث وا١ٍٜاع ا١ٓام رٛ٣ 14 ١ف٨ث 1991. .2012 ث٨ف١ 6 ٣ٛر ٦ٰ٥خي١ا ن٬٧ا - ٛ8

- ا١ٜا٬٧ن رٛ٣ 17 ١ف٨ث 2013ٛ ا٬٧ن ا١خٓػٯ٠ ا١غا٤ؿ ١ٜا٬٧ن ٤ش٢ؿ ك٬رى ا١ػو١ث رٛ٣ 65 ١ف٨ث 1979. .2015 ث٨ف١ 31 ٣ٛر ٦ٰ٥خي١ا ن٬٧ا -ٛ10

.2017 ث٨ف١ 17 ٣ٛر ث١ػو١ا ؿ٢ش٤ ن٬٧ا -ٛ11

Downloads

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

امىدرس امدكخِر وُدي خىدي وُدي, & امىدرشث امىصاغدة ٌَد غتداألوير غنِش. (2018). The Competences of Kurdistan Region Employees Disciplinary Committee and appealing its provisions. QALAAI ZANIST JOURNAL, 3(1), 804–821. https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.3.1.29

Issue

Section

Articles