Control over Crime Theory in the Rome Statute
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The International Criminal Court has adopted the control over crime theory, to establish criminal responsibility for co-perpetration and indirect perpetration under article 25(3) (a) of the Rome Statute. As a result the court has been facing a wide range of criticism.
It is important to clarify the notion of the control theory and make a reasonable interpretation of co-perpetration and indirect perpetration within the meaning of article 25(3) (a) according to the control theory for distinguishing between principles and accessories and secure the convection of multiple accused who in spite of being removed from the scene of the crime, control or mastermind its commission because they decide whether and how the offence will be committed.
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Qalaai Zanist Journal allows the author to retain the copyright in their articles. Articles are instead made available under a Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use research provided the author is correctly attributed.
Creative Commons is a licensing scheme that allows authors to license their work so that others may re-use it without having to contact them for permission