Assessing the Effect of Audit Quality on Agency Dynamics: Evidence in Kurdistan

Sardar Jalal Braim; Rebin Bilal Mohammed; Bryar Sami Abdulrahman

doi:10.25212/lfu.qzj.9.2.45

Authors

Sardar Jalal Braim Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Administration and Economics, Lebanese French University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Rebin Bilal Mohammed Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Administration and Economics, Lebanese French University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Bryar Sami Abdulrahman Department of Accounting and Finance, College of Administration and Economics, Lebanese French University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.9.2.45

Keywords:

Agency dynamics, audit quality, corporate governance mechanisms, level of agency conflicts, shareholders and managers’ interests

Abstract

The study’s objective is to analyze how audit quality impacts the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms, the role of auditors in aligning the interests of shareholders and managers, and the reduction of the level of agency conflicts. The problem being that agency dynamics encompass the complex interactions and potential conflicts of interest that emerge when managers, acting as agents, make decisions on behalf of shareholders, who are the ultimate principals. 198 questionnaire responses were collected from accountants, auditors, finance managers and general managers of food and retail, banking, manufacturing, education and construction companies in Erbil city were analyzed using a single regression analysis approach. The results of the study demonstrated that improvements in audit quality significantly enhance the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms and the role of auditors in aligning the interests of shareholders and managers. Audit quality’s impact on the reduction of the level of agency conflicts was found to be insignificant. The study revealed positive effects spanning from audit quality, corporate governance mechanisms, auditors’ roles to improved agency dynamics in Kurdistan-based companies. Auditors and auditing firms should prioritize continuous improvement in audit quality, investing in professional development and adherence to international auditing standards. Moreover, companies in Kurdistan should adopt and promote robust corporate governance practices that align the interests of shareholders and managers. Regulatory bodies in Kurdistan should consider reviewing and updating the regulatory framework governing audit quality and corporate governance to ensure alignment with best practices and international standards

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anastasopoulos, N. P., & Anastasopoulos, M. P. (2012). The evolutionary dynamics of audit. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(2), 469-476.

Anwer, S. A., Mohammad, A. J., Abdulrahman, B. S., Qader, K. S., Jamil, D. A., Gardi, B., & Khalid, K. (2022). Leading Project teams: The role of leadership styles in dynamic work environment.

Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative research methods: A synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 33(5471), 1-8.

Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2019). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 33(3), 103-128.

Behbahaninia, P. S. (2022). Agency costs and auditor choice: moderating role of board’s expertise and internal control. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.

Braim, S. J., & Mohammed, R. B. (2022). The Impact of Audit Committee Composition and Performance on Financial Reporting Quality in Kurdistan’s Industrial Companies. QALAAI ZANIST JOURNAL, 7(4), 1051-1070.

Brown, P. A., & Lee, R. (2018). Audit Quality and Firm Performance: Evidence from Kurdistan. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Accounting and Finance (pp. 123-137). Publisher.

Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-39.

Dang, L., & Fang, Q. (2011). Audit quality and owner-manager agency costs: Evidence from China. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(1), 46-62.

Das, J. P., & Kumar, S. (2023). The dynamic effect of corporate financial hedging on firm value: The case of Indian MNCs. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(3), 696-708.

DeFond, M. L., Erkens, D. H., & Zhang, J. (2020). The effect of PCAOB inspections on auditor‐client contracting. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2), 457-500.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.

Eldyasty, M. M., & Elamer, A. A. (2023). Audit (or) type and audit quality in emerging markets: evidence from explicit vs. implicit restatements. Review of Accounting and Finance, 22(4), 489-507.

Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., & Abdelfattah, T. (2022). The key audit matters and the audit cost: does governance matter? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(1), 195-217.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

Garcia, M. L. (2017). Essays on Corporate Governance and Audit Quality (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kurdistan.

Gujarati, D. N. (2022). Basic econometrics. Prentice Hall.

Hackbarth, D., & Sun, D. (2023). Corporate investment and financing dynamics. Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Forthcoming.

Hu, K., Ren, Z., & Yang, J. (2023). Principal-agent problem with multiple principals. Stochastics, 95(5), 878-905.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Johnson, A. B., & Davis, C. R. (2020). The Impact of Audit Quality on Shareholder Value. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 561-589.

Jusoh, M. A., & Ahmad, A. (2013). Managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit quality and firm performance in Malaysian. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(10), 1-16.

Karzan Qader Hamad, Khowanas Saeed Qader, Rahim Jafar Mahammad Sharif. (2021). “EFFECTIVENESS AND ADEQUACY OF DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS IN TEHRAN STOCK EXCHANGE”. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 18(08), 2379-2388. Retrieved from https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/9120

Kasbar, M. S. H., Tsitsianis, N., Triantafylli, A., & Haslam, C. (2023). An empirical evaluation of the impact of agency conflicts on the association between corporate governance and firm financial performance. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(2), 235-259.

Khaksar, J., Salehi, M., & Dashtbayaz, M. L. (2022). The relationship between political relations with audit quality and auditor industry expertise. Journal of Public Affairs, 22, e2780.

Krishnan, G. V. (2018). Audit quality and cost of debt. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 170-197.

Lugli, E., & Bertacchini, F. (2023). Audit quality and digitalization: some insights from theItalian context. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(4), 841-860.

Mehrad, A., & Zangeneh, M. H. T. (2019). Comparison between qualitative and quantitative research approaches: Social sciences. International Journal For Research In Educational Studies, Iran, 5(7), 1-7.

Mustafa, A. S., Barwari, A. S., & Mohammed, N. H. (2018). Minority Shareholders' rights and audit quality: empirical evidence from Turkey. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 4(4), 27-44.

Nehme, R. (2013). Dynamics of audit quality: behavioural approach and governance framework: UK evidence (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).

Qader KS, Cek K. Analysis of the Impact of External Auditors’ Autonomy on Financial Accounting Information Quality Case Study Commercial Banks in Northern Iraq. Sustainability. 2023; 15(12):9578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129578

Rawi, R., & Muchlish, M. (2022). Audit quality, audit committee, media exposure, and Corporate Social Responsibility. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 85-96.

Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11.

Sultan, K., Ahmed, R. R., Jafar, R., Murtaza, M. M., & Gardi, B. (2020). Corporate financial policy and its impact on sustainable capital structure: empirical evidence from textile firms of pakistan. Humanities & Social Science Review, 149-158.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53.

Zahid, R. A., Saleem, A., Maqsood, U. S., & Sági, J. (2023). Moderating role of audit quality in ESG performance and capital financing dynamics: insights in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-30