An Analysis of Semantic Presupposition in Sherwood Anderson’s Short Story “BROTHERS”

Banaz Ahmad Qadir; Suhayla Hameed Majeed

doi:10.25212/lfu.qzj.8.1.42

Authors

Banaz Ahmad Qadir Department of English, College of languages, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Suhayla Hameed Majeed Department of English, College of languages, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.8.1.42

Keywords:

Semantic presupposition, Types of presupposition, Short story

Abstract

Semantic Presupposition is a kind of inference that sentences of natural languages may have. The semantic presupposition is associated with certain lexical items and particular grammatical constructions. A wide range of research has been conducted for explaining presupposition in various domains, the current study is trying to investigate semantic presupposition in the English short story ‘Brothers’ written by Sherwood Anderson through content analysis of the selected texts adopting Yule’s theory (1996) embedding Levinson’s classification of presupposition triggers (1983). Besides, it aims to find the most dominant type of semantic presupposition in the English short story ‘Brothers’ by calculating the types of presuppositions found in the short story. Accordingly, (4) texts have been selected from the English short story, then they were studied in terms of types of presupposition, namely existential, factive, lexical, non-factive, structural, and counter-factual. The results demonstrate that only five types of presuppositions are found in the short story and the total number of presuppositions occurring in the short story is (672) times. Besides, the analysis of the texts shows that the most frequently used presupposition type in the English short story was Existential which appeared (x`560) times or about (83.3%), and the factive presupposition is the least used type which appears (9) times or about (1.3%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allwood, J., Andersson, L. and Dahl, O. (1977) Logic in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, Sh. (1992) ‘Brothers’, in Modlin, Ch. E. (ed.) Certain Things Last. The Selected Short Stories of Sherwood Anderson. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, pp. 39-47.

Ayumi, Y. R. (2020) ‘Pragmatics Analysis of Presupposition as Found in The Tagline of Horror Movie Posters’, Vivid: Journal of Language and Literature, 9(2), pp.99-105. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25077/vj.9.2.99-104.2020 (Accessed on 9/5/2022).

Beaver, D. I. (1997) ‘Presupposition’, in Benthem, J. V., and Meulen, A. (eds.) The Handbook of Logic and Language. Cambridge: Elsevier Science B.V, pp. 939-1001.

Birner, B. J. (2013) Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Castillo, C. (2003) ‘The Difference Between Restrictive and Non-Restrictive Relative Clauses’, Atlantis, 25(2), pp. 25-38. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41055114 (Accessed: 27/2/2022).

Chierchia, G. (1995) Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Crystal, D. (2008) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Cummins, C. and Katsos, N. (eds.) (2019) Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: University Press.

Finch, G. (2000) Linguistic Terms and Concepts. New York: Palgrave.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. and Hyams, N. (2011) An Introduction to Language. 9th edn. Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Geurts, B. (2017) ‘Presupposition and Givenness’, in Huang, Y. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 180-198.

Griffiths, P. (2006) An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Grundy, P. (2000) Doing Pragmatics. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

Huang, Y. (2014) Oxford Textbook in Linguistics: Pragmatics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kamal, D. A. (2009) Kurdish Political Discourse: from The Perspective of Presupposition. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Salahaddin.

Karttunen, L. (2016) ‘Presupposition: What went wrong?’, Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 26(26) pp. 705–731. DOI:10.3765/salt.v26i0.3954

Karttunen, L. (1973) ‘Presupposition of Compound Sentences’, Linguistic Inquiry, 4(2), pp. 169-193. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177763 (Accessed 2/11/2021).

Khaleel, L. M. (2010) ‘An Analysis of Presupposition Triggers in English Journalistic Texts’, Journal of College of Education for Women, 21 (2), pp. 523-551. (Accessed: 31/12/2021).

Kroeger, P. R. (2018) Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Leech, G. (1981) Semantics: The study of Meaning. 2nd edn. London: Pelican Books.

Levinson, S. C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oualif, M. (2017) ‘Presupposition: A Semantic or Pragmatic Phenomenon?’, Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(3), pp. 46 -59. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no3. (Accessed: 8/11/2021).

Parker, F. and Riley, K. (2005) Linguistics for Non-Linguistics. 4th edn. Boston: Pearson.

Saeed, J. I. (2009) Semantics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Stalnaker, R. (1973) ‘Presuppositions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), pp. 447-457.

Yule, G. (1996) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.