The Applications of The Right to Be Forgetting

Marwan Kamel Jomaah Al-Khalidy; Yaseen Myasar Aziz

doi:10.25212/lfu.qzj.7.1.37

توێژەران

Marwan Kamel Jomaah Al-Khalidy Department of Law, College of Law, Knowledge University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Yaseen Myasar Aziz Department of Law, College of Law, Knowledge University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.7.1.37

##semicolon##

Rights, Forgotten, Personal Data, Preserving

پوختە

The Right to be Forgotten (RTF) has appeared since the 1960s and has emerged again as the idea conflicted with the imposition of technical reality in terms of retaining personal data for unknown periods of time that may be difficult unless it is impossible to erase it from the virtual map. There are many activities that users carry out over the Internet, whether in the form of comments, special news, pictures, or personal information, whether the user himself puts it or another party publishes it, which includes a process of transition from the control of an owner of the information over to the control of other parties. This transition process has brought many problems to Internet users and has become a clear threat to their privacy and their right to enter forgotten. Hence, this has precipitated the emergence of a new legal concept, which is the right to digital forgetting as a right to the private life of the individual. This research aims to define the right to digital forgetting, define areas of its application, and clarify the viewpoint of legislators, jurisprudence and the judiciary, as it is an emerging concept in the international and local legal arena

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

سەرچاوەکان

Article 17 of the 2005 constitution provides that every individual shall have the right to personal privacy, so long it does not contradict the rights of others and public morals.

Article 57 of the Egyptian Constitution of 2014 states that: Private life Private life is inviolable, safeguarded and may not be infringed upon. Telegraph, postal, and electronic correspondence, telephone calls, and other forms of communication are inviolable, their confidentiality is guaranteed and they may only be confiscated, examined or monitored by causal judicial order, for a limited period of time, and in cases specified by the law. The state shall protect the rights of citizens to use all forms of public means of communication, which may not be arbitrarily disrupted, stopped or withheld from citizens, as regulated by the law.

Bennett, S. C. (2012). The right to be forgotten: Reconciling EU and US perspectives. Berkeley J. Int'l L., 30, 161.

Bertram, T., Bursztein, E., Caro, S., Chao, H., Chin Feman, R., Fleischer, P., ... & Kammourieh Donnelly, L. (2019, November). Five Years of the Right to be Forgotten. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 959-972).

Bobić, A. (2020). Developments in The EU-German Judicial Love Story: The Right To Be Forgotten II. German Law Journal, 21(S1), 31-39.

Cour de cassation، chambre civile1، arrêt du 19novembre 2014.

Draft of Informatic Crimes Law.

Goldmann, M. (2020). As Darkness Deepens: The Right to be Forgotten in the Context of Authoritarian Constitutionalism. German Law Journal, 21(S1), 45-54.

Guillaume Desgens-Pasanau، op، cit،p52. Et Luc Grynbaum et Caroline Le Goffic،op، cit، P850

Martín, B. (2020). Google v. CNIL and the Right to Be Forgotten: A Judgment of Solomon. Global Privacy Law Review, 1(1).

Quillet, E. (2011). The right to digitalization on social networks. Master of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Directed by Emmanuel Decaux, University year, Panthéon Assas University. P.901

Rustad, M. L., & Kulevska, S. (2014). Reconceptualizing the right to be forgotten to enable transatlantic data flow. Harv. JL & Tech., 28, 349

Tribunal de grande instance de Paris 2012، 15 février

Tribunal de grande instance de Paris، ord 30janvier 2013.

Villaronga, E. F., Kieseberg, P., & Li, T. (2018). Humans forget, machines remember: Artificial intelligence and the right to be forgotten. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 304-313.