A Cognitive Semantic Analysis of Selected American Political Caricatures on Covid 19

توێژەران

  • Ikhlas Mahdi Hasan Department of English Language, College of Basic Education, University of Halabja, Sulaimanie, Kurdistan Region
  • Ayad Hameed Mahmood Department of English Language, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Diyala, Diyala, Iraq

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.8.1.41

##semicolon##

Cognitive Semantics, Construal Theory, Political Cartoons, Prominence, Profiling, Trajectory/Landmark

پوختە

Political caricatures are reflections of real situations or affairs that are summarized through drawings. Recently, they have become key elements in political communication since they manipulate different verbal and visual elements in shaping the political messages and attracting the recipient's attention. These different modes include verbal and visual elements. Accordingly, they provide a new framework to understand political discourse. This paper is an attempt to examine the efficiency of Langacker’s (2008-2017) construal dimension of prominence to the analysis of visual and verbal elements of political caricatures. It aims to prove that the prominence parameters of profiling and trajectory/ landmark alignment can account for the phenomenon of multiple construal triggered by visual and verbal modes, and the process of meaning construction in political caricatures. To achieve these aims, a sample of American political caricatures published on Covid 19 has been selected to be analyzed. Analysis of the selected data shows that the semantic content of the political cartoons resides on the visual and verbal elements employed in these caricatures. Both types of elements highly depend on Langacker’s two construal parameters of prominence, profiling and trajector/landmark, in constructing and conveying their intended messages. In addition, the way the conceptualizers construe the scenes participates greatly to decoding these messages.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

سەرچاوەکان

Croft, W. & D. Alan C. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Forceville, C. (2009). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In: Eija Ventola and Arsenio Jésus Moya Guijarro (eds), The World Told and the World Shown: Issues in Multisemiotics. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 56-74

Hamawand, Z. (2016). Semantics: a cognitive account of linguistic meaning. UK:Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Harrison, Ch., Nuttallall, L., Stockwell, P. & Yuan, W. (Edts.)(2014). Cognitive grammar in literature. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamin‟s Publishing Company.

Harrison, C. E., (2017). Cognitive grammar in contemporary fiction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. (1990). Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Langacker, R. (1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. II, Descriptive Applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. 1999: Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Langacker, R. (2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Langacker, R. (2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mateus, Samuel .(2016). Political cartoons as communicative weapons – the hypothesis of the double standard thesis in three portuguese cartoons. Research Gate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311759836

Möttönen, T. (2016). Construal in expression: an intersubjective approach to cognitive grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Helsinki.

Radden, G. & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rehman, S. (2018). Politicizing cartoons, cartooning Politics: a Semiotic analysis of American media political cartoons on Islam. MA thesis National University of Modern Languages: Faculty of Languages.

Saeed, J. I. (2009). Semantics. United Kingdom: Blackwell publishing

Talmy, L. (2000a).Toward a cognitive semantics. vol. I. Massachusetts, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Talmy, L. (2000b).Toward a cognitive semantics. vol. II. Massachusetts, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Taylor, John.R(2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

##submission.downloads##

بڵاو کرایەوە

2023-03-30

ژمارە

بەش

Articles