Comparative Study Between Normal Traditional Methods in Hair Removal and Recent Laser Technology

Authors

  • Hassan Jalal Aziz General science department, Collage of Basic Education, University of Salahaddin, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.7.4.40

Keywords:

Hair removal, laser, classical, wound, injuries.

Abstract

The types of laser instruments used for patients’ treatment were: Cynosure Elite Laser, Epicare Alexnrite Laser, Candle Gentle Yag Laser hair removal machine, Diod Lser hair removal, Gentle Laser plus. The studies' goal is to comparing traditional hair removal methods (such as wet shave or waxing) with laser technique in order to conduct clinical trials. The findings of the first group, in which 165 people took part, revealed that pain produced by wound infection in the time following the process is significantly associated with the existence and severity of postoperative wound infection. When it comes to preoperative hair removal, namely after shaving, it is highly connected with the existence and severity of skin injuries of various ranks suffered during the procedure. The second group, which included 190 competitors (160 females, 30 males). The findings revealed a breakdown of the adverse effects that were noticed and documented during the course of the research. 44.1 percent of the population has skin sensitivity, 2.8 percent has skin irritation, 14.5 percent has erythema, 24.1 percent has burns, and 14.5 percent has hyperpigmentation, according to the study.

Additionally, a comparison and contrast of ethnicity, as well as the effects of traditional and laser treatment methods, were included in the study. The samples, which were identified by ethnicity, were collected from several clinics around the state and compared to the results of the study (which used traditional and laser methodologies) conducted in Erbil. There was no statistically meaningful variation between the two groups based on those assessments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. 1.National Audit Office 2004 (2004) Improving patient care by reducing the risk of hospital acquired infection: A progress report. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. HC 876, Session 2003–2004 London, The Stationery Office.

. Ratanalert S, Saehaeng S, Sripairojkul B, Liewchanpattana K, Phuenpathom N (1999) Nonshaved cranial neurosurgery. SurgNeurol51:458- 463.

. Tanner J, Woodings D, Moncaster K (2006) Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19: CD004122.

. Gil Z, Cohen JT, Spektor S, Fliss DM (2003) The role of hair shaving in skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128: 43-47.

. Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH (2001)Themeasurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events. Health Technol Asses 5:1-194.

. Tanner J and Parkinson H (2002) Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection. Cochrane DatabaseSyst Rev 3: CD00308.

. Tanner J, Swarbrook S, Stuart J (2008) Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane DatabaseSyst Rev 1: CD004288.

. Town G, Ash C, Dierickx C, Fritz K, Bjerring P, Haedersdal M. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology. J EurAcadDermatolVenereol. 2012;26:799–811.

. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220:524–7.

. Ito S, Fujita K. Microanalysis of eumelanin and pheomelanin in hair and melanomas by chemical degradation and liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem. 1985;144:527–36.

. Rogers CJ, Glaser DA. Treatment of pseudofolliculitisbarbae using the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with topical carbon suspension. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:737–42.

. Radmanesh M. Paradoxical hypertrichosis and terminal hair change after intense pulsed light hair removal therapy. J Dermatolog Treat. 2009;20:52–4.

. Alajlan A, Shapiro J, Rivers JK, MacDonald N, Wiggin J, Lui H. Paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser epilation. J Am AcadDermatol. 2005;53:85–8.

. Kontoes P, Vlachos S, Konstantinos M, Anastasia L, Myrto S. Hair induction after laser-assisted hair removal and its treatment. J Am 15.Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:64–7.Shirkavand A, Ataie-Fashtami L, Sarkar S, et al. Thermal damage patterns of diode hair-removal lasers according to various skin types and hair densities and colors: a simulation study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012;30:374–80.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Hassan Jalal Aziz. (2022). Comparative Study Between Normal Traditional Methods in Hair Removal and Recent Laser Technology. QALAAI ZANIST JOURNAL, 7(4), 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.25212/lfu.qzj.7.4.40

Issue

Section

Articles